Author
Listed:
- Henrique de Castro Neves
- Jose Carlos de Souza Colares
- Joao Bosco Favero
- Jean Carlo Silva dos Santos
- Rosangela Aparecida da Silva
Abstract
This article aims to answer how the decision process model used to adjudicate on the implementation of outsourcing in the company affected the competitive advantage in costs obtained by the organization after the implementation of subcontracting. Therefore, the financial results obtained by the company in the period from 2015 to 2019 were analysed in order to know if there were competitive advantages in costs arising from the decision to implement outsourcing. Studies were also carried out on the structure of the decision-making process adopted by the entity to identify the level of efficiency of this model in the implementation of outsourcing, and finally, the impacts generated on these advantages due to the degree of efficiency of the tool application were verified. The research strategy was qualitative and quantitative, with an exploratory bias, bibliographic survey and structured interview. A mathematical model was used based on 14 (fourteen) decision-making efficiency indicators, 4 (four) efficiency level classification indicators and 5 (five) classification criteria for performance. The results showed that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the low level of efficiency in the decision-making structure contributed to the high financial impact on Company Alpha and, consequently, to the negative impact on competitiveness acquired through the implementation of outsourcing in this entity, which caused financial disadvantages represented by losses in operating income and reduction in profitability.
Suggested Citation
Henrique de Castro Neves & Jose Carlos de Souza Colares & Joao Bosco Favero & Jean Carlo Silva dos Santos & Rosangela Aparecida da Silva, 2021.
"Effects of the Decision-Making Process on the Competitive Advantage in Costs Obtained After Implementing Outsourcing,"
International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(5), pages 33-46, September.
Handle:
RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:12:y:2021:i:5:p:33-46
DOI: 10.5430/ijba.v12n5p33
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:12:y:2021:i:5:p:33-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijba.sciedupress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.