IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Geopolitical Stake: Republic Of Moldova Between The European Union And The Eurasian Union


  • Mircea-Cristian Ghenghea

    () (Research Department of the Faculty of History within Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)


This paper presents a comparative analysis of how Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania handled the process of nation-building, finding their self in their new reality which was no longer created and manipulated by the Soviets since their breakaway from the USSR. To do so, this paper suggests an ingenious method of the identity politics analysis which focuses on the importance of the so-called “lieux de mémoire” or “meaning-full places” for people. Monuments and statues are good examples of such places and play an important role in identity construction due to their ability to evoke particular kinds of feelings in people. Undertaking an in-depth analysis of monuments in Baltic States provides a valuable insight on the possibilities and challenges of Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia to develop communities of shared values and to finally stop living in the shade of their “post-Sovietness”.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea-Cristian Ghenghea, 2014. "A Geopolitical Stake: Republic Of Moldova Between The European Union And The Eurasian Union," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(2a), pages 86-93, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2014:v:6:i:2a:p:86-93

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Monuments; national identity; Soviet Union; “Monument Wars”; Baltic States Romania;

    JEL classification:

    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2014:v:6:i:2a:p:86-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alupului Ciprian). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.