IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.56year2022issue1pp175-191.html

Modeling JSE Stock Returns Dynamics: GARCH Versus Stochastic Volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Terence D. Agbeyegbe

    (City University of New York, USA)

Abstract

Volatility is an essential parameter in risk management applications, and it can affect economic activity and public confidence. It is also a key parameter in several studies examining the link between the stock market, economic growth, and other financial variables. This paper seeks to broaden our understanding of volatility in a Small Island Developing State capital market by conducting a Bayesian model comparison of several volatility models for modeling stock returns on the Jamaica Stock Exchange (JSE). The paper uses a formal Bayesian model comparison methodology to compare seven generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (GARCH) type models and seven stochastic volatility (SV) type models using the daily JSE index, All Items, from January 03, 2012, December 31, 2019, from the Jamaica Stock Exchange Database. The models include the standard models of GARCH(1,1) and SV with an AR(1) log-volatility process and models with jumps, volatility in mean, leverage effects, heavy-tailed distribution, and moving average innovations. The results reveal that SV models generally fit the data better than their GARCH counterparts. The heavy-tailed distributed innovations and the jump component substantially improve the performance of the basic GARCH and SV models. It also finds that allowing for the moving average component improves the fit of both GARCH and SV models. The result also indicates that volatility feedback is essential. There is also evidence of a significant inverse leverage effect. In total, the SV model with Student-t innovations is the best. The result presented has a potential value for academics, policymakers, and practitioners. For academics, the evidence of the dominance of the SV models over their GARCH counterparts would suggest that spillover studies involving Jamaica would gain from adopting the SV specification. The result also has a potential value for the Bank of Jamaica (BOJ). The BOJ can adopt the SV-t framework rather than a GARCH framework as a tool for gauging volatility in the JSE. Lastly, using the SV model to compute volatility would provide more accurate pricing and risk management results for practitioners, especially global fund managers who plan to include JSE stocks for asset allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Terence D. Agbeyegbe, 2022. "Modeling JSE Stock Returns Dynamics: GARCH Versus Stochastic Volatility," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 56(1), pages 175-191, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue1:pp:175-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/51/article/835750
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E31 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.56:year:2022:issue1:pp:175-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.