IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.53year2019issue3pp199-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Microcredit Influence Parent’s Decision To Send A Child To School Or To Work?

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Thu Tra Pham
  • Kien Son Nguyen

    (RMIT University, Vietnam
    Eastern International University, Vietnam)

Abstract

Given the increased attention to microfinance and its role in reducing poverty in the developing world, it is important to consider the effects of microcredit on household decision making beyond those that affect household income and expenditure. Using three-year panel data drawn from the Vietnam Household Living Standard Surveys 2010, 2012 and 2014, this study assesses the impact of microcredit on household decisions on child schooling and child labor for rural Vietnam. Distinct from existing studies that rely on dichotomous participation dummies of child labor and schooling, this study uses average working hours per day as a proxy for child labor and schooling gap to measure the quality of child schooling. The analysis employs instrumental variable methods featured in various regression models to control for the possible endogeneity of credit and thereby identify the true effect of credit on the outcome variables. For both indicators of microcredit participation—the dichotomous participation dummy and the accumulated amount of microcredit received per household— the analysis shows that credit participation by households encourages child labor as a result of a rise the demand for child labor and lowers the quality of child schooling in households that are recipients of microcredit. More credit enables households to expand their production activities by acquiring more capital inputs and thus precipitating them to practice more child labor. More credit widens the schooling gap of children, and this undesirable effect is strongly observed for schooling gaps of more than one year. These findings raise a number of important policy issues. Microcredit programs are widely praised for their well-documented effect of raising household welfare and reducing household poverty, but what is generally ignored is the adverse effects of microcredit on child schooling and child labor. These results suggest the contribution of microfinance to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which include the reduction of both poverty and child labor, is more complicated than is generally recognized. When introducing and evaluating of microcredit programs that target the poor in developing countries, the positive income effects of microcredit must be therefore weighed against the negative child labor effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Thu Tra Pham & Kien Son Nguyen, 2019. "Does Microcredit Influence Parent’s Decision To Send A Child To School Or To Work?," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 53(3), pages 199-211, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.53:year:2019:issue3:pp:199-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/715378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Microcredit; Child Schooling; Child Labor; Asia; Vietnam;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.53:year:2019:issue3:pp:199-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.