IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.51year2017issue4pp285-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Export and gender difference in production contribution: A joint and non-linear analysis using panel and firm-level data

Author

Listed:
  • Ruohan Wu

    (Alabama State University, USA)

Abstract

Trade liberalization has been widely recognized to have a profound influence on the labor market, especially in developing countries. Amid the transformation of gender roles, the improvement of female workers’ welfare has received increasing attention. In such studies, the gender wage gap generally is the focus, and the residual wage gap is commonly used to measure discrimination. However, this paper empirically examines gender differences in workers’ contributions to production through labor efficiency and productivity, which are defined separately. We use panel data on Chilean manufacturing firms from 2001 to 2007. Non-linear estimations are conducted to determine the gender differences in these firms. We first decompose male and female labor efficiency based on a traditional Cobb-Douglas production function. Next, we extend the Cobb-Douglas function and use a semi-parametric method to remove endogeneity and reduce bias estimation. We then also decompose female and male workers’ contributions to productivity. The results show that, among domestic firms which do not export, female workers contribute significantly lower efficiency and productivity than male workers. Among firms which participate in the exporting market, the differences in the efficiency and productivity of female and male workers are insignificant. Therefore, gender production differences are found to be significant in domestic but not exporting firms. Besides the firms’ exporting status, we also estimate the impact of capital ownership and exporting revenue on gender as alternative robustness tests. The findings remain consistent. Firms which do not adopt foreign capital, or operating exclusively in the domestic market, have significant, unequal distributions of labor efficiency and productivity between female and male workers. Firms which are actively involved in foreign markets have insignificantly gender differences. Therefore, export-market participation indeed reduces gender differences and guarantees similar contributions by female and male employees. High productivity, advanced managerial philosophy, and capability to compete globally all encourage a firm to export, and to equalize the treatment and contribution of male and female employees as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruohan Wu, 2017. "Export and gender difference in production contribution: A joint and non-linear analysis using panel and firm-level data," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(4), pages 285-302, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue4:pp:285-302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/662843
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender differences; labor efficiency; productivity; exporting firms; domestic firms;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue4:pp:285-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.