IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue5pp431-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the context of an international development project

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Ginsberg

    (Griffith University, Australia)

Abstract

One of the most difficult aspects of international development project planning is determining what the context of a project is. This paper presents the Circles of Sustainability (Situated and Differentiated Project), or CoS (SDP) framework to assist development practitioners to more clearly identify and reflect on the essential socially driven context considerations of a community development project. This paper contends that the role of the NGO is often overlooked as a significant and critical project context factor. Therefore the concept of ‘the NGO Construct’ is explored as the basis for the framework presented. The final model presented is a sphere that is divided into two halves – the ‘situated context’ on one side and the ‘differentiated context’ on the other, the whole of which identifies eight major social domains that allow for the vibrancy and multifarious nature of communities to be more fully appreciated. This sphere depicts the eight domains as intricate and interrelating to one another. Rather than separate externalities, the domains are coherent analytical categories informing the larger holistic social entity. It is argued that only when the two halves of the context – the ‘situated and differentiated’ are established, can a project context be more comprehensively appraised. The model arises from utilizing RMIT Global Cities Research Institute’s original Circles of Sustainability framework as one half of the framework, as it clearly presents four local ‘situated’ context domains (Economics, Ecology, Politics and Culture). The other half of the framework consists of four ‘differentiated’ domains drawn from the NGO Construct, namely Presiding Conventions, Institutional (NGO), Project Operations and Personal (Project Staff). These four differentiated domains are further broken down and discussed to identify seven essential perspectives. By undertaking this detailed analysis of context factors, it is hoped that project planning will be more strategic and sustainable and will highlight that all the dynamics outlined in the framework occur at any one time. The model is designed to inspire debate and become a collaborative process tool for development practitioners to engage further reflection, discussion and creative project analysis. The final model is a visually stimulating heuristic representation of the array of complex, yet accessible macro and micro factors that intersect to create each unique project environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Ginsberg, 2016. "Determining the context of an international development project," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(5), pages 431-442, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue5:pp:431-442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/619677
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Development; Community Projects; Development Context; NGOs; Project Management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue5:pp:431-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.