IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.49year2015issue6pp349-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender equality in education and economic growth in selected Southern African countries

Author

Listed:
  • Elsa Alexandra Licumba
  • Janet Dzator
  • James Xiaohe Zhang

    (University of Newcastle, Australia)

Abstract

Poverty reduction remains a big challenge in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) region, and economic growth is seen as a key ingredient to reduce poverty rates. Therefore, the region has been making significant commitments to embrace a more inclusive growth approach through the creation of the SADC Gender Unit as well as the regional Protocol on Gender. The aim of these interventions is to promote sustainable economic growth and reduce poverty rates. However, the attempts at testing for a positive and significant contribution of gender equality in education on economic growth have generated mixed results. Furthermore, as the empirical evidence comes from various parts of the world, only very little attention has been devoted to the SADC region. This research aims to fill this gap in literature. Hence this study examines the impact of gender equality in education on economic growth on a panel data of five Southern African countries between 1970 and 2010. The number of panels was restricted by data availability and a set of regression equation have been carried out for the sample, using Stata software Version 12. In this analysis, gender equality in education is measured by the ratio of girls to boys in primary enrolment, and economic growth is measured by real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita at 2005 constant prices. To account for the possible endogeneity of the gender equality variable, the instrumental variable (IV) techniques are used. Gender equality in education is instrumented by religion as it tested to be a powerful instrument. The evidence presented in this analysis suggests that there is a positive and significant effect of gender equality in education on economic growth in the region at 1% and 10% significance levels. We have also tested the sensitivity of our results to changes in the model specification. The dependent variable was re-specified to per capita GDP at purchasing power parity as opposed to real GDP per capita. In addition a time-trend variable was added to the existing explanatory variable. Gender equality in education remains positive and significant at the 1% significance level. These results indicate that the effects of gender equality in education to be positive significant and robust to changes in specification. This result advocates some policy adjustment in education planning within the region to ensure the retention of girl students, as well as raising education quality, to stimulate economic growth. Reducing gender inequality in education will not only promote growth but also help to d advance other valuable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Elsa Alexandra Licumba & Janet Dzator & James Xiaohe Zhang, 2015. "Gender equality in education and economic growth in selected Southern African countries," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(6), pages 349-360, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue6:pp:349-360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_developing_areas/v049/49.6.licumba.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giscard Assoumou-ella, 2019. "Gender Inequality in Education and per capita GDP: the case of CEMAC Countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(2), pages 1154-1162.
    2. Moataz, Aya & Richter, Christian, 2022. "The Impact of Female Tertiary Education and Climate Change on Economic Growth in Developing Countries," Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department 337137, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.
    3. Onyeke Queen Obiageli & Chukwuagoziem S. Agu & Okafor Samson Nonso & Eze Chikodili & Chukwuma Chisom Cynthia, 2022. "Underscoring the Relationship Between Education for Women and National Development in Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    4. Ziroat Mirziyoyeva & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2022. "Women’s Parliamentary Representation and Sustainable Development Goals: a Cross-Country Evidence," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 871-883, April.
    5. Laura Cabeza-García & Esther B. Del Brio & Mery Luz Oscanoa-Victorio, 2018. "Gender Factors and Inclusive Economic Growth: The Silent Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Anna Gdakowicz & Malgorzata Guzowska & Marta Hozer-Koćmiel & Leszek Gracz, 2023. "Gender Equality and Economic Growth in BSR and EAP Countries: A Quantitative Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 354-378.
    7. Moataz, Aya & Richter, Christian, 2022. "The Impact of Female Tertiary Education and Climate Change on Economic Growth in Developing Countries," Agri-Tech Economics Papers 337137, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.
    8. Yu Zhang & Jianguo Liu, 2022. "Does Education Affect Economic Growth? A Re-Examination of Empirical Data from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender equality; education; poverty; economic growth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D9 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • J10 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue6:pp:349-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.