IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isp/journl/v11y2017i1p67-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinction Between Economic Transition In China And Russia (Soviet Union)

Author

Listed:
  • Ivo Družić
  • Nora Mustać

Abstract

Two of the most profound communist economies were Soviet Union and China. Both countries were engaged in transition from planned to market economy. However, the results have been almost the opposite. Communism in Soviet Union collapsed while Chinese transition is characterized by rapid emergence of the market economy. The paths of economic transition in these two countries were distinct, especially, the period when reforms started. Notably, many reasons caused the success of China, as well as Soviet crash. Nevertheless, while Russia has fully complied to International Monetary Fund and World Bank shock therapy transition model, China has established innovative gradual approach to the economic reforms and full market economy. In this paper we examine the cause of different success of transition in these countries and point out the key factors which cause it, such as initial conditions, political leadership and empirically-based pace of reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivo Družić & Nora Mustać, 2017. "Distinction Between Economic Transition In China And Russia (Soviet Union)," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 11(1), pages 67-76.
  • Handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:67-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scientific-publications.net/get/1000025/1503417570502214.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic transition; shock therapy; gradual reforms; china; soviet union; russia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A - General Economics and Teaching

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:67-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Svetoslav Ivanov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scientific-publications.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.