IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orstsc/v7y2022i3p210-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stepping into Ill-Fitting Shoes: Local Status Contrasts and Acquisitiveness of New CEOs

Author

Listed:
  • Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode

    (Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada)

  • Rekha Krishnan

    (Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada)

Abstract

This paper asks what motivates new chief executive officers (CEOs) to engage in an acquisition spree despite the considerable risk it entails to themselves and their firms. Building on status theory and performance feedback theory, we theorized that status distance between new CEOs and their predecessors explains the empire-building behavior of new CEOs early in their tenure. Because of the uncertainty surrounding a CEO’s quality early in the individual’s tenure, status serves as a signal of quality for the new CEO. Hence, CEOs had to rely on status signals to maintain or close the status gap between them and their predecessors. Drawing on performance feedback theory, we theorized that new CEOs’ status contrast relative to their predecessor influences their acquisitive behavior. Our examination of the acquisition behavior of 429 new CEOs of S&P 500 firms in the United States revealed that relatively low-status CEOs engaged in risk-taking to improve their status, but relatively high-status new CEOs engaged in risk-taking to maintain their lead. It also revealed that new CEOs changed their risk-taking behavior when direct evidence of their quality or that of their predecessors deviated from the underlying quality expectations indicated by their relative status position.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode & Rekha Krishnan, 2022. "Stepping into Ill-Fitting Shoes: Local Status Contrasts and Acquisitiveness of New CEOs," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 210-239, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:7:y:2022:i:3:p:210-239
    DOI: 10.1287/stsc.2021.0150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0150
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/stsc.2021.0150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:7:y:2022:i:3:p:210-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.