IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v8y1997i3p275-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Irony and the Social Construction of Contradiction in the Humor of a Management Team

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Jo Hatch

    (Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford MK43 0AL, England)

Abstract

The thesis I explore in this essay is that organizational members use humorous remarks to discursively construct and organize their cognitive and emotional experiences in and of their organizations. My assumptions are that: (1) organizations are socially constructed through discourse about them (especially managerial discourse), (2) humorous discourse provides a contradiction-centered construction of organizations that operates in the domains of both cognition and emotion, and (3) interpretation of the text of ironic remarks will suggest the processes by which contradictions and their cultural and emotional contexts are socially constructed through discourse. In this essay I use a form of analysis that I developed in relation to humor theory (Mulkay [Mulkay, M. 1988. On Humor . Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.]), theories of irony (Brown [Brown, R. H. 1977. A Poetic for Sociology: Toward a Logic of Discovery for the Human Sciences . University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.], Weick and Browning [Weick, K. E., L. D. Browning. 1986. Argument and narration in organizational communication. J. G. Hunt, J. D. Blair, eds. 1986 Yearly Review of Management of the Journal of Management 12 243--259) and Rorty's (Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.) concept of the ironic disposition to interpret spontaneous humorous exchanges observed during the regular meetings of a group of middle managers. My interpretations of ironically humorous remarks indicate that the managers in my study constructed at least some of their cognitive and emotional experiences in contradictory ways including: possible/impossible, great/horrible, comic/serious, and up-to-date/unprepared. The interpretations also suggest how, in constructing contradiction, the managers reflexively constructed themselves in relation to their organization. The analysis points to a paradoxical understanding of organizational stability and change and informs a contradiction-centered view of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Jo Hatch, 1997. "Irony and the Social Construction of Contradiction in the Humor of a Management Team," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 275-288, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:8:y:1997:i:3:p:275-288
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.8.3.275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.3.275
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.8.3.275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sevón, Guje & Välikangas, Liisa, 2009. "Of Managers, Ideas and Jesters," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2009:1, Stockholm School of Economics.
    2. Maureen Scully & W.E. Douglas Creed, 1999. "Restructured Families: Issues of Equality and Need," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 562(1), pages 47-65, March.
    3. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:8:y:1997:i:3:p:275-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.