IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v5y1994i2p173-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firm-Specificity in Corporate Applied R&D

Author

Listed:
  • Constance E. Helfat

    (Department of Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6370)

Abstract

Much corporate research and development (R&D) has characteristics that tie it strongly to the firm in which it takes place, and which may make the process of undertaking R&D or the outcome of the R&D difficult for other firms to duplicate perfectly. That is, the R&D is firm-specific. This is particularly true for more highly applied R&D, which tends to involve incremental technological change and often entails alterations and enhancements to existing firm assets, production processes, and products. The often firm-specific nature of corporate R&D tends to receive relatively little attention in the study of technological innovation. This article outlines the primary characteristics of firm-specificity in R&D, and discusses two interrelated consequences of such firm-specificity: (1) heterogeneity in the R&D applications of firms within an industry, and (2) increased ability of firms to earn returns to R&D (often termed “appropriability”). Both factors have important implications for firm strategy. Empirical evidence from the U.S. petroleum industry is presented that documents differences between firms in their R&D applications. The evidence is consistent with firm-specificity in R&D.

Suggested Citation

  • Constance E. Helfat, 1994. "Firm-Specificity in Corporate Applied R&D," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 173-184, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:5:y:1994:i:2:p:173-184
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.5.2.173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.173
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.5.2.173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:5:y:1994:i:2:p:173-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.