IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v37y2026i2p638-663.html

The Failure to Recognize Anti-Asian Discrimination

Author

Listed:
  • Sora Jun

    (Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business and Virani Undergraduate School of Business, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005)

  • Junfeng Wu

    (Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Dejun Tony Kong

    (Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309)

Abstract

Anti-Asian discrimination remains prevalent in the United States but continues to be reported and charged at low levels. In the current research, we seek to understand this puzzle in the context of workplace discrimination. Integrating the literature on the U.S. racial status hierarchy—which positions Asian Americans as an intermediate status group situated in between White and Black Americans—with the prototype model of attributions to discrimination , we propose that lay observers do not consider Asian Americans to be prototypical targets of racial discrimination. As a result, we predict that observers are less likely to attribute potentially discriminatory incidents to discrimination when those incidents involve Asian (compared with Black) targets. We find evidence supporting our predictions across two studies assessing prototypes of targets of racial discrimination (Studies 1 and 2), three preregistered experiments comparing attributions to discrimination for Asian and Black job candidates (Studies 3–5), and a data set of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission discrimination charges (Study 6). Our research makes theoretical advances on the racial experience of Asian employees by identifying Asian Americans as nonprototypical targets of racism and underscoring the relative failure of attributions to discrimination as an insidious problem that likely perpetuates anti-Asian racism at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Sora Jun & Junfeng Wu & Dejun Tony Kong, 2026. "The Failure to Recognize Anti-Asian Discrimination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 638-663, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:638-663
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2024.18628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.18628
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2024.18628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:638-663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.