IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v36y2025i2p862-880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Path Coherence and Disruption in Routine Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Inkyu Kim

    (California State University, East Bay, Hayward, California 94542)

  • Brian T. Pentland

    (Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824)

  • Kenneth A. Frank

    (Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824)

  • Julie Ryan Wolf

    (University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627)

Abstract

We use evidence from a disruption of clinical documentation routines to propose a novel, predictive mechanism for routine dynamics based on path coherence . Path coherence refers to the continuity of situational attributes from one event to the next along a path, for example, a set of activities conducted by the same person has high actor coherence. Situational attributes include classic descriptors such as who, what, when, where, and why. To be recognized as a path, a minimal level of coherence is required, but path coherence can vary along a path. For example, in a medical clinic, typical paths flow from place to place (e.g., reception, waiting room, exam room) and involve different clinical staff (e.g., receptionist, nurse, physician). Using latent factor network models, we compare clinical documentation routines in five outpatient clinics before and after a technological disruption (an upgrade to the electronic health record system). We show that coherent paths are up to 14 times more likely to persist and up to 40 times more likely to form than less coherent paths. We use these findings to theorize about the role of path coherence in routine dynamics. Path coherence in narrative networks is like homophily in social networks, but with a completely different underlying mechanism. We discuss the implications of our findings for organizational path dependence, resilience, and inertia.

Suggested Citation

  • Inkyu Kim & Brian T. Pentland & Kenneth A. Frank & Julie Ryan Wolf, 2025. "Path Coherence and Disruption in Routine Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 862-880, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:862-880
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.16749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16749
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.16749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:862-880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.