Author
Listed:
- Rajshree Agarwal
(Department of Management and Organizations, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)
- Francesca Bacco
(Department of Management and Organisation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands)
- Arnaldo Camuffo
(Department of Management and Technology, Bocconi University, 21036 Milan, Italy; and ION Management Science Lab, Bocconi and Utah University, 21036 Milan, Italy)
- Andrea Coali
(ION Management Science Lab, Bocconi and Utah University, 21036 Milan, Italy)
- Alfonso Gambardella
(Department of Management and Technology, Bocconi University, 21036 Milan, Italy; and ION Management Science Lab, Bocconi and Utah University, 21036 Milan, Italy)
- Haji Msangi
(Rwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture, Gashora, Bugesera, Rwanda)
- Steven Sonka
(Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois 61822)
- Anna Temu
(Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania)
- Betty Waized
(Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania)
- Audra Wormald
(Strategy and Entrepreneurship Area, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599)
Abstract
Entrepreneurs making decisions under uncertainty are encouraged to evaluate their initial ideas through hypothesis testing, but entrepreneurial approaches vary in their emphasis on ex-ante theory development prior to collecting evidence. In this paper, we examine whether and how entrepreneurs benefit from adopting an evidence-based approach or a theory-and-evidence-based approach to decision making. We conducted a field experiment with Tanzanian agribusiness entrepreneurs by randomly assigning entrepreneurs to two different training conditions. We find that entrepreneurs in the theory-and-evidence–based condition have higher economic performance during the observation period following the intervention. We conjecture this result stems from differences in the types of changes enacted: entrepreneurs in the theory-and-evidence–based training make more coordinated changes that encompass both core and operational elements of their business models.
Suggested Citation
Rajshree Agarwal & Francesca Bacco & Arnaldo Camuffo & Andrea Coali & Alfonso Gambardella & Haji Msangi & Steven Sonka & Anna Temu & Betty Waized & Audra Wormald, 2025.
"Does a Theory-of-Value Add Value? Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial with Tanzanian Entrepreneurs,"
Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 601-625, March.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:601-625
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2023.17590
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:601-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.