IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v35y2024i2p573-600.html

The Reconnection Process: Mobilizing the Social Capital of Dormant Ties

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuela Rondi

    (Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Bergamo 24127, Italy)

  • Daniel Z. Levin

    (Management and Global Business Department, Rutgers Business School – Newark and New Brunswick, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey 07102)

  • Alfredo De Massis

    (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; IMD Business School, CH-1001 Lausanne, Switzerland; Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster LA1 4YX, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Prior research has identified the value of reconnecting dormant ties (i.e., people you used to know), allowing individuals to refresh relationships and mobilize the value inherent in a tie (i.e., its social capital). However, less well understood is how this reconnection process occurs, including how it can be done well or poorly. To address this lack of knowledge, we conducted multi-organizational research combining an inductive, qualitative field study of professional reconnections by individuals in the North Italian textile district (Study 1) and, to validate our findings, a vignette-based experiment with U.S. workers (Study 2). We find that the process of reconnecting dormant ties can and does fail, sometimes dramatically, when people do not refresh the tie and, as a result, do not trust where they stand with each other. Specifically, we find that three elements—remembering, catching up, and perceiving the tie similarly—are key to successfully mobilizing the value of a dormant tie.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuela Rondi & Daniel Z. Levin & Alfredo De Massis, 2024. "The Reconnection Process: Mobilizing the Social Capital of Dormant Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 573-600, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:573-600
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2023.1685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1685
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2023.1685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam M. Kleinbaum, 2018. "Reorganization and Tie Decay Choices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2219-2237, May.
    2. Sarah L. Jack, 2005. "The Role, Use and Activation of Strong and Weak Network Ties: A Qualitative Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1233-1259, September.
    3. Christian Linder & Christian Lechner & Frank Pelzel, 2020. "Many Roads Lead to Rome: How Human, Social, and Financial Capital Are Related to New Venture Survival," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(5), pages 909-932, September.
    4. Olli‐Pekka Kauppila & Lorenzo Bizzi & David Obstfeld, 2018. "Connecting and creating: tertius iungens, individual creativity, and strategic decision processes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 697-719, March.
    5. Francesca Mariotti & Rick Delbridge, 2012. "Overcoming Network Overload and Redundancy in Interorganizational Networks: The Roles of Potential and Latent Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 511-528, April.
    6. Ray Reagans & Linda Argote & Daria Brooks, 2005. "Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 869-881, June.
    7. Balagopal Vissa, 2012. "Agency in Action: Entrepreneurs' Networking Style and Initiation of Economic Exchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 492-510, April.
    8. Linda Argote & Brandy L. Aven & Jonathan Kush, 2018. "The Effects of Communication Networks and Turnover on Transactive Memory and Group Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 191-206, April.
    9. Mathis Schulte & N. Andrew Cohen & Katherine J. Klein, 2012. "The Coevolution of Network Ties and Perceptions of Team Psychological Safety," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 564-581, April.
    10. Jared Nai & Yimin Lin & Reddi Kotha & Balagopal Vissa, 2022. "A foot in the door: Field experiments on entrepreneurs' network activation strategies for investor referrals," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 323-339, February.
    11. Christian Lechner & Michael Dowling, 2003. "Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Jorge Walter & Daniel Z. Levin & J. Keith Murnighan, 2015. "Reconnection Choices: Selecting the Most Valuable (vs. Most Preferred) Dormant Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1447-1465, October.
    13. Ben M. Bensaou & Charles Galunic & Claudia Jonczyk-Sédès, 2014. "Players and Purists: Networking Strategies and Agency of Service Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 29-56, February.
    14. Pratima Bansal & Wendy K. Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02312197, HAL.
    15. Victoria (Shu) Zhang & Marissa D. King, 2021. "Tie Decay and Dissolution: Contentious Prescribing Practices in the Prescription Drug Epidemic," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 1149-1173, September.
    16. Pratima Bansal & Wendy Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02276705, HAL.
    17. Daniel Z. Levin & Rob Cross, 2004. "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1477-1490, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katharina Scheidgen & Anna Brattström, 2023. "Berlin is Hotter Than Silicon Valley! How Networking Temperature Shapes Entrepreneurs’ Networking Across Social Contexts," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2233-2262, November.
    2. Salih Zeki Ozdemir & Peter Moran & Xing Zhong & Martin J. Bliemel, 2016. "Reaching and Acquiring Valuable Resources: The Entrepreneur's Use of Brokerage, Cohesion, and Embeddedness," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(1), pages 49-79, January.
    3. Kim Klyver & Pia Arenius, 2022. "Networking, Social Skills and Launching a New Business: A 3-Year Study of Nascent Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(5), pages 1256-1283, September.
    4. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    5. Jorge Walter & Daniel Z. Levin & J. Keith Murnighan, 2015. "Reconnection Choices: Selecting the Most Valuable (vs. Most Preferred) Dormant Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1447-1465, October.
    6. Gautam Ahuja & Giuseppe Soda & Akbar Zaheer, 2012. "The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 434-448, April.
    7. Ambos, Tina C. & Tippmann, Esther & Nell, Phillip C., 2023. "Realizing subsidiary initiatives: A network mobilization view," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    8. Elco Van Burg & Joep Cornelissen & Wouter Stam & Sarah Jack, 2022. "Advancing Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: Leveraging Methodological Plurality for Achieving Scholarly Impact," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 3-20, January.
    9. Chollet, Barthélemy & Revet, Karine, 2023. "Digging deep or scratching the surface? Contingent innovation outcomes of seeking advice from geographically distant ties," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Feng-Wen Chen & Meng-Xian Lin & Ting Wang, 2018. "Sustainable Resource Acquisition Path: A Dynamic Model of Embedded Entrepreneurial Network Governance under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Mariëtte Kaandorp & Elco van Burg & Tomas Karlsson, 2020. "Initial Networking Processes of Student Entrepreneurs: The Role of Action and Evaluation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(3), pages 527-556, May.
    12. Engel, Yuval & Kaandorp, Mariëtte & Elfring, Tom, 2017. "Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 35-51.
    13. Stefano Tasselli & Alessandro Sancino, 2023. "Leaders' Networking Behaviours in a Time of Crisis: A Qualitative Study on the Frontline against COVID‐19," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 120-173, January.
    14. Samuel Mayanja & Joseph M. Ntayi & John C. Munene & Waswa Balunywa & James R. K. Kagaari, 2021. "Informational differences and entrepreneurial networking among small and medium enterprises in Uganda," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 563-577, December.
    15. Linda Argote & Jerry Guo & Ki-Won Haan & Matthew R. Rosengart & Cindy Y. Teng & Jeremy M. Kahn, 2026. "Transactive Memory Systems and Hospital Trauma Team Performance: Shared Experience in Action Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 48-70, January.
    16. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    17. Ronald S. Burt & Sonja Opper & Håkan J. Holm, 2022. "Cooperation Beyond the Network," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 495-517, March.
    18. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & McKelvey, Maureen & Yegros, Alfredo, 2022. "Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    19. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    20. Akhil Bhardwaj & Anastasia Sergeeva & Joseph Mahoney & Jackson Nickerson, 2025. "Theorizing as Problem Solving: A Pragmatist Perspective on the Logic of Pursuit," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 338-359, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:573-600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.