IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i5p1864-1886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theorizing Organizational Benevolence

Author

Listed:
  • ‘Alim J. Beveridge

    (University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China)

  • Markus A. Höllerer

    (UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Vienna University of Economics and Business, 1020 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

We extend research on stakeholder orientation by introducing and conceptualizing “organizational benevolence”—a notion that refers to a firm’s inclination to pursue the welfare of an external stakeholder group as an end in itself manifested in a behavioral tendency in which benefiting the “other” is the ultimate goal of action. Employing a microfoundational approach, we propose a theoretical framework and a process model that explain how firms develop such a posture and how it eventually can become an enduring feature of these organizations. We build our framework on the core notion of collective commitment to the well-being of an external constituency by elaborating on the processes through which such collective commitment is mobilized, translated into collective intention, and stabilized in a behavioral tendency. Our article develops several propositions highlighting the crucial roles that emotionality and rhetoric play in these processes, alongside an enabling sociocognitive infrastructure. Overall, our work goes substantially beyond current theorizing and provides a detailed account for why some firms not founded with a prosocial mission nonetheless act consistently to benefit an external constituency in the absence of instrumental reasons to do so.

Suggested Citation

  • ‘Alim J. Beveridge & Markus A. Höllerer, 2023. "Theorizing Organizational Benevolence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 1864-1886, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:5:p:1864-1886
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1646
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.1646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:5:p:1864-1886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.