IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i4p1458-1486.html

Bridgework: A Model of Brokering Relationships Across Social Boundaries in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Tiffany D. Johnson

    (Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30308)

  • Aparna Joshi

    (Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16801)

  • Glen E. Kreiner

    (Department of Management, David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112)

Abstract

Relationships are central to organizing, work, and organizations. Yet, in many instances, relationships do not build themselves, and third-party actors are often needed to intervene in situations, persuade individuals, and facilitate connections across disconnected actors in organizations. Little is known about the strategies through which third-party actors can broker relationships across what are considered to be intractable social boundaries—membership in stigmatized or nonstigmatized social identity-based groups. We build a process theory of what we call “bridgework,” the strategy used by third-party agents, intermediaries, and allies to bridge by shifting value-related perceptions about actors on the other side of social identity-based divides. More specifically, we focus on a stigmatizing social identity that can create boundaries that are often reinforced through informal network ties. Based on interviews, participatory observation, and archival data with job coaches for adults with autism spectrum disorders and related developmental disabilities, we showcase a model of bridgework—a combination of internal and external strategies across three stages (adding, stabilizing, and maintaining perceptions of value) to facilitate relationships between stigmatized and nonstigmatized members of organizations. We discuss how our grounded model contributes to the rich traditions of research on stigma, brokerage, disability studies, positive relationships, and compassion in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiffany D. Johnson & Aparna Joshi & Glen E. Kreiner, 2023. "Bridgework: A Model of Brokering Relationships Across Social Boundaries in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1458-1486, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:4:p:1458-1486
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.1631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabat, Isaac E. & Martinez, Larry R. & Wessel, Jennifer L., 2013. "Neo-Activism: Engaging Allies in Modern Workplace Discrimination Reduction," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 480-485, December.
    2. Hong Ren & Barbara Gray & David A. Harrison, 2015. "Triggering Faultline Effects in Teams: The Importance of Bridging Friendship Ties and Breaching Animosity Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 390-404, April.
    3. Lyons, Brent J. & Lynch, John W. & Johnson, Tiffany D., 2020. "Gay and lesbian disclosure and heterosexual identity threat: The role of heterosexual identity commitment in shaping de-stigmatization," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1-18.
    4. Zheng Jane Zhao & Jaideep Anand, 2013. "Beyond boundary spanners: The ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(13), pages 1513-1530, December.
    5. Sabat, Isaac E. & Lindsey, Alex P. & Membere, Ashley & Anderson, Amanda & Ahmad, Afra & King, Eden & Bolunmez, Balca, 2014. "Invisible Disabilities: Unique Strategies for Workplace Allies," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 259-265, June.
    6. Lindsey, Alex & King, Eden & McCausland, Tracy & Jones, Kristen & Dunleavy, Eric, 2013. "What We Know and Don't: Eradicating Employment Discrimination 50 Years After the Civil Rights Act," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 391-413, December.
    7. Vanessa K. Bohns & Francis J. Flynn, 2013. "Guilt by Design: Structuring Organizations to Elicit Guilt as an Affective Reaction to Failure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1157-1173, August.
    8. Herminia Ibarra & Martin Kilduff & Wenpin Tsai, 2005. "Zooming In and Out: Connecting Individuals and Collectivities at the Frontiers of Organizational Network Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 359-371, August.
    9. Xiaoli Yin & Jianfeng Wu & Wenpin Tsai, 2012. "When Unconnected Others Connect: Does Degree of Brokerage Persist After the Formation of a Multipartner Alliance?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1682-1699, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhattacharyya, Barnini & Erskine, Samantha E. & McCluney, Courtney, 2024. "Not all allies are created equal: An intersectional examination of relational allyship for women of color at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Kossek, Ellen Ernst & Ladge, Jamie & Little, Laura M. & Loyd, Denise Lewin & Smith, Alexis Nicole & Tinsley, Catherine H., 2024. "Introduction to the special issue: Allyship, advocacy, and social justice to support equality for marginalized groups in the workplace," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Sonia Ghumman & Ann Marie Ryan & Jin Suk Park, 2024. "Who Helps Who? The Role of Stigma Dimensions in Harassment Intervention," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 87-109, January.
    4. Mohsen Jozani & Charles Zhechao Liu & Hongyi Zhu & Long Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 2025. "A Network Analysis of Mobile App Top Chart Appearance and Survival," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 2359-2381, December.
    5. Pandza, Krsto & Ellwood, Paul, 2013. "Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1112-1125.
    6. Marco Tortoriello & Ray Reagans & Bill McEvily, 2012. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1024-1039, August.
    7. Kilduff, Martin & Crossland, Craig & Tsai, Wenpin & Krackhardt, David, 2008. "Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 15-28, September.
    8. Shan Xue & Yi Tang & Yuehua Xu & Chu-Ding Ling & Xiao-Yun Xie & Shenjiang Mo, 2024. "How boards’ factional faultlines affect corporate financial fraud," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 351-376, March.
    9. Soda, Giuseppe & Zaheer, Akbar & Sun, Xiaoming & Cui, Wentian, 2021. "Brokerage evolution in innovation contexts: Formal structure, network neighborhoods and knowledge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    10. E. N. Bridwell-Mitchell & Theresa K. Lant, 2014. "Be Careful What You Wish For: The Effects of Issue Interpretation on Social Choices in Professional Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 401-419, April.
    11. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    12. Jonathan Wareham & Paul B. Fox & Josep Lluís Cano Giner, 2014. "Technology Ecosystem Governance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1195-1215, August.
    13. Ray Reagans, 2011. "Close Encounters: Analyzing How Social Similarity and Propinquity Contribute to Strong Network Connections," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 835-849, August.
    14. Gurneeta Vasudeva & Jennifer W. Spencer & Hildy J. Teegen, 2013. "Bringing the Institutional Context Back In: A Cross-National Comparison of Alliance Partner Selection and Knowledge Acquisition," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 319-338, April.
    15. Ying Wang & Shufeng Xiao & Run Ren, 2022. "A Moral Cleansing Process: How and When Does Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior Increase Prohibitive and Promotive Voice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 175-193, February.
    16. Carayannis, Elias G. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Wurth, Bernd, 2022. "OR for entrepreneurial ecosystems: A problem-oriented review and agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 791-808.
    17. Bernhard, Fabian, 2022. "When bankers feel guilty–Employees’ vicarious guilt and the support of moral business practices," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 419-428.
    18. Jarle Aarstad & Sven A. Haugland & Arent Greve, 2010. "Performance Spillover Effects in Entrepreneurial Networks: Assessing a Dyadic Theory of Social Capital," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(5), pages 1003-1020, September.
    19. Elisa Operti & Shemuel Y. Lampronti & Stoyan V. Sgourev, 2020. "Hold Your Horses : Temporal Multiplexity and Conflict Moderation in the Palio di Siena (1743–2010)," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 85-102, January.
    20. Daniel Tzabbar & Bruno Cirillo & Stefano Breschi, 2022. "The Differential Impact of Intrafirm Collaboration and Technological Network Centrality on Employees’ Likelihood of Leaving the Firm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2250-2273, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:4:p:1458-1486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.