IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i3p1157-1183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rising Above vs. Falling Below: When and Why Status Change Affects Interpersonal Helping in Workgroups

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah P. Doyle

    (Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721)

  • Robert B. Lount

    (Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210)

Abstract

The current research sheds new light on how and why status hierarchies impact interpersonal helping by examining people’s reactions to recently experienced status change. Specifically, we incorporate findings from research on the self-serving attributional bias to theorize about how the direction of status change (i.e., a gain or a loss) can shape the extent to which people accept or deflect personal responsibility for their change in status, which we argue will then impact other-concern and, thus, their willingness to help. Further, we identify status change legitimacy as a key contingency that will strengthen or weaken the psychological and behavioral effects of status change. Among firefighter teams (Study 1), participants in the laboratory (Studies 2 and 3), and student teams (Study 4), we show that (1) status change impacts interpersonal helping through its impact on changes in other-concern and (2) status change legitimacy moderates the effect of status change on both other-concern and interpersonal helping. Additionally, we document an asymmetry with regards to the effects of status change on both other-concern and helping behavior (i.e., with the negative impact of a status loss being stronger than the positive impact of a status gain). Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah P. Doyle & Robert B. Lount, 2023. "Rising Above vs. Falling Below: When and Why Status Change Affects Interpersonal Helping in Workgroups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1157-1183, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:1157-1183
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1613
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.1613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:1157-1183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.