IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i2p509-531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How the Basis for Status Perceptions Varies with Perceiver Status

Author

Listed:
  • David Tan

    (Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle,Washington 98195)

  • Christopher I. Rider

    (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

Abstract

We posit a novel mechanism—socially endogenous calibration—whereby the tendency to align with others’ perceptions of organizational status varies systematically with the status of a perceiver’s own organization. We specifically theorize that members of higher-status organizations perceive larger and more correlated status differences among other organizations than members of lower-status organizations do. Using a simulation, we demonstrate how socially endogenous calibration yields these predictions even when quality is uniform across organizations. We further present empirical support for our arguments by analyzing data on individual-level prestige ratings of U.S. law firms. Integrating socially endogenous calibration with prevailing status perspectives based on quality uncertainty, we conclude by elaborating a novel research agenda on stability and instability in organizational status hierarchies.

Suggested Citation

  • David Tan & Christopher I. Rider, 2023. "How the Basis for Status Perceptions Varies with Perceiver Status," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 509-531, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:509-531
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1582
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.1582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    status; third-order inference;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:509-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.