IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i1p24-50.html

The Role of Resources in the Success or Failure of Diverse Teams: Resource Scarcity Activates Negative Performance-Detracting Resource Dynamics in Social Category Diverse Teams

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Yu

    (Organization Behavior Area, Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005)

  • Lindred L. Greer

    (Department of Management and Organization, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

Abstract

Increasing the social category diversity of work teams is top of mind for many organizations. However, such efforts may not always be sufficiently resourced, given the numerous resource demands facing organizations. In this paper, we offer a novel take on the relationship between social category diversity and team performance, seeking to understand the role resources may play in both altering and explaining the performance dynamics of diverse teams. Specifically, our resource framework explains how the effects of social category diversity on team performance can be explained by intrateam resource cognitions and behaviors and are dependent on team resource availability. We propose that in the face of scarcity in a focal resource (i.e., budget), diverse (but not homogenous) teams generalize this scarcity perception to fear that all resources (i.e., staff, time, etc.) are scarce, prompting performance-detracting power struggles over resources within the team. We find support for our model in three multimethod team-level studies, including two laboratory studies of interacting teams and a field study of work teams in research and development firms. Our resource framework provides a new lens to study the success or failure of diverse teams by illuminating a previously overlooked danger in diverse teams (negative resource cognitions (scarcity spillover bias) and behaviors (intrateam power struggles)), which offers enhanced explanatory power over prior explanations. This resource framework for the study of team diversity also yields insight into how to remove the roadblocks that may occur in diverse teams, highlighting the necessity of resource sufficiency for the success of diverse teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Yu & Lindred L. Greer, 2023. "The Role of Resources in the Success or Failure of Diverse Teams: Resource Scarcity Activates Negative Performance-Detracting Resource Dynamics in Social Category Diverse Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 24-50, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:1:p:24-50
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1560
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beersma, Bianca & De Dreu, Carsten K. W., 2002. "Integrative and Distributive Negotiation in Small Groups: Effects of Task Structure, Decision Rule, and Social Motive," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 227-252, March.
    2. Daniels, David P. & Neale, Margaret A. & Greer, Lindred L., 2017. "Spillover bias in diversity judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 92-105.
    3. Sirola, Nina & Pitesa, Marko, 2018. "The macroeconomic environment and the psychology of work evaluation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 11-24.
    4. Robert B. Lount & Oliver J. Sheldon & Floor Rink & Katherine W. Phillips, 2015. "Biased Perceptions of Racially Diverse Teams and Their Consequences for Resource Support," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1351-1364, October.
    5. Prediger, Sebastian & Vollan, Björn & Herrmann, Benedikt, 2014. "Resource scarcity and antisocial behavior," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Lount Jr., Robert B. & Phillips, Katherine W., 2007. "Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 214-224, July.
    7. Folkes, Valerie S & Martin, Ingrid M & Gupta, Kamal, 1993. "When to Say When: Effects of Supply on Usage," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 467-477, December.
    8. David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene & Martin A. Nowak, 2012. "Spontaneous giving and calculated greed," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7416), pages 427-430, September.
    9. J. Eric Oliver & Janelle Wong, 2003. "Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(4), pages 567-582, October.
    10. Gatiso, Tsegaye T. & Vollan, Björn & Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2015. "Resource scarcity and democratic elections in commons dilemmas: An experiment on forest use in Ethiopia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 199-207.
    11. van Ginkel, Wendy P. & van Knippenberg, Daan, 2009. "Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: When and why does it work?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 218-229, March.
    12. Kelly, Janice R. & Barsade, Sigal G., 2001. "Mood and Emotions in Small Groups and Work Teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 99-130, September.
    13. Rapoport, Amnon & Boebel, Richard B., 1992. "Mixed strategies in strictly competitive games: A further test of the minimax hypothesis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 261-283, April.
    14. Greer, Lindred L. & Caruso, Heather M. & Jehn, Karen A., 2011. "The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 116-128, September.
    15. Kanniainen, Vesa & Keuschnigg, Christian, 2004. "Start-up investment with scarce venture capital support," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 1935-1959, August.
    16. Denise Lewin Loyd & Cynthia S. Wang & Katherine W. Phillips & Robert B. Lount, 2013. "Social Category Diversity Promotes Premeeting Elaboration: The Role of Relationship Focus," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 757-772, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Ji & Suqing Wu & Xiao-Yun Xie, 2026. "When shared leadership backfires in new venture teams: the roles of power struggles and functional background diversity," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 113-136, March.
    2. Hyunji Ju & Yeonbae Kim, 2025. "Bridging Diversity and Innovation: The Moderating Role of Cohesive and Hierarchical Organizational Culture," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440241, January.
    3. Colin M. Fisher & Sujin Jang & J. Richard Hackman, 2024. "Caught Between a Clock and a Hard Place: Temporal Ambivalence and Time (Mis)management in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 307-325, January.
    4. Kariyushi Rao, 2025. "The Effects of Competition and Scarcity on Interpersonal Communication in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1939-1961, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartoš, Vojtěch, 2021. "Seasonal scarcity and sharing norms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 303-316.
    2. Nils Christian Hoenow & Gunther Bensch & Michael Kirk, 2026. "Introducing and Terminating Monetary Incentives in Non-Regenerating Forests: Insights from a Framed Field Experiment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 89(6), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Tang, Honghong & Li, Lin & Su, Song, 2022. "Experiencing less leads to the use of more: The effect of a scarcity mindset on product usage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 139-148.
    4. Robert B. Lount & Oliver J. Sheldon & Floor Rink & Katherine W. Phillips, 2015. "Biased Perceptions of Racially Diverse Teams and Their Consequences for Resource Support," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1351-1364, October.
    5. Florian Diekert & Kjell Arne Brekke, 2022. "Groups discipline resource use under scarcity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 75-103, February.
    6. Jodi L. Short & Michael W. Toffel & Andrea R. Hugill, 2016. "Monitoring global supply chains," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1878-1897, September.
    7. Dickinson, David L. & Masclet, David, 2023. "Unethical decision making and sleep restriction: Experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 484-502.
    8. Lu Wang & Lorna Doucet & Mary Waller & Karin Sanders & Sybil Phillips, 2016. "A Laughing Matter: Patterns of Laughter and the Effectiveness of Working Dyads," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1142-1160, October.
    9. Nie, Zihan & Yang, Xiaojun & Tu, Qin, 2020. "Resource scarcity and cooperation: Evidence from a gravity irrigation system in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Astrid Dannenberg & Charlotte Klatt & Pia Pico, 2024. "The Effects of Growing Groups and Scarcity on the Use of a Common Pool Resource – a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment with Lake Victoria Fishers," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(11), pages 2833-2858, November.
    11. McCarter, Matthew W. & Wade-Benzoni, Kimberly A. & Kamal, Darcy K. Fudge & Bang, H. Min & Hyde, Steven J. & Maredia, Reshma, 2020. "Models of intragroup conflict in management: A literature review," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 925-946.
    12. Blanco, Esther & Lopez, Maria Claudia & Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio, 2015. "Exogenous degradation in the commons: Field experimental evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 430-439.
    13. Cynthia Wang & Gillian Ku & Alexis Nicole Smith & Bryan Edwards & Edward Scott & Adam D. Galinsky, 2025. "Increasing Black Employees’ Social Identity Affirmation and Organizational Involvement: Reducing Social Uncertainty Through Organizational and Individual Strategies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 809-837, March.
    14. Devon Proudfoot & Zachariah Berry & Edward H. Chang & Min B. Kay, 2024. "The Diversity Heuristic: How Team Demographic Composition Influences Judgments of Team Creativity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3879-3901, June.
    15. Boonmanunt, Suparee & Meier, Stephan, 2023. "The effect of financial constraints on in-group bias: Evidence from rice farmers in Thailand," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 96-109.
    16. Hoenow, Nils Christian & Kirk, Michael, 2021. "Does competitive scarcity affect the speed of resource extraction? A common-pool resource lab-in-the-field experiment on land use in northern Namibia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Brice Corgnet & Antonio M. Espin & Roberto Hernán-González, 2015. "The cognitive basis of social behavior : cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives," Post-Print hal-02311954, HAL.
    18. Daan van Knippenberg & Hanneke J. M. Kooij-de Bode & Wendy P. van Ginkel, 2010. "The Interactive Effects of Mood and Trait Negative Affect in Group Decision Making," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 731-744, June.
    19. repec:plo:pone00:0079039 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Lohse, Johannes & Goeschl, Timo & Diederich , Johannes, 2014. "Giving is a question of time: Response times and contributions to a real world public good," Working Papers 0566, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    21. de Haan, J. & Hermes, C.L.M. & Postma, T.J.B.M. & Veltrop, D.B., 2012. "A tale of two factions," Research Report 12001-HRM&OB, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:1:p:24-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.