IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v33y2022i3p873-900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breaking the Cycle of Overwork and Recuperation: Altering Somatic Engagement Across Boundaries

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie J. Creary

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Karen Locke

    (Mason School of Business, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23186)

Abstract

Past research often relegates the management of the ideal worker’s overworking body to the nonwork environment. Reflecting a segmentation approach to managing the boundary between work and nonwork, the nonwork setting is treated as a context for recuperation. Yet, segmentation may, ironically, support the ideal worker image and reinforce the persistence of overwork. Drawing on two-year-long ethnographic studies of yoga teacher training, this paper considers how individuals shift how they manage the boundaries around their bodies. In doing so, we challenge the notion that segmentation of nonwork from work is an ideal boundary management strategy for addressing the negative impacts of overwork. Rather, we suggest that an integration strategy developed in a nonwork community may be productive for breaking the cycle of overwork and recuperation promoted by the ideal worker image and creating a virtuous cycle of activation and release. We bring forward the bodily basis to overwork and conceptualize somatic engagement as a form of engagement through which actors come to connect reflexively with their bodily experience across domains. Relatedly, in revealing how individuals come to connect reflexively with their bodily experience, we elaborate our understanding of the relational phenomena that enhance individuals’ somatic experiences across boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie J. Creary & Karen Locke, 2022. "Breaking the Cycle of Overwork and Recuperation: Altering Somatic Engagement Across Boundaries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 873-900, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:873-900
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:873-900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.