IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v33y2022i2p746-765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Certification Relics: Entrepreneurship Amidst Discontinued Certifications

Author

Listed:
  • Robert N. Eberhart

    (Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Daniel Erian Armanios

    (SaÏd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, United Kingdom)

Abstract

We explore a key tension between certification and entrepreneurial entry. On the one hand, more stringent certifications may provide greater legitimacy. On the other hand, market entry may be facilitated by easing such standards. To reconcile this tension, we examine discontinued certifications. We draw on research into how new ventures use certifications to gain legitimacy, along with quantitative data from new venture credit records. We show that after a certification is discontinued, new ventures in emerging industries continue to conform to these discontinued certified standards. Our study shows that those whose attributes do not provide other sources of legitimacy (e.g., unconventional founders in emerging industries) are more likely than other new ventures to comply with discontinued certification. However, those with other legitimating attributes (e.g., elite institution alumni founders) can overcome such legitimacy deficits and take advantage of new rules easing entry. Overall, our findings show that discontinued certifications can become certification “relics” whose standards continue to linger and influence entry, even after they are no longer formally in effect. Our study and its findings enhance our understanding of institutional support for new ventures, as well as the repertoire of strategic actions available to new ventures to gain legitimacy and acceptance in the face of institutional change.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert N. Eberhart & Daniel Erian Armanios, 2022. "Certification Relics: Entrepreneurship Amidst Discontinued Certifications," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 746-765, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:2:p:746-765
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1458
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:2:p:746-765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.