IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v72y2024i1p355-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanism Design Under Approximate Incentive Compatibility

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago R. Balseiro

    (Department of Decision, Risk, and Operations, Columbia Business School, New York, New York 10027)

  • Omar Besbes

    (Department of Decision, Risk, and Operations, Columbia Business School, New York, New York 10027)

  • Francisco Castro

    (Department of Decisions, Operations & Technology Management, Anderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095)

Abstract

A fundamental assumption in classical mechanism design is that buyers are perfect optimizers. However, in practice, buyers may be limited by their computational capabilities or a lack of information and may not be able to perfectly optimize their response to a mechanism. This has motivated the introduction of approximate incentive compatibility (IC) as an appealing solution concept for practical mechanism design. Although most of the literature has focused on the analysis of particular approximate IC mechanisms, this paper is the first to study the design of optimal mechanisms in the space of approximate IC mechanisms and to explore how much revenue can be garnered by moving from exact to approximate incentive constraints. In particular, we study the problem of a seller facing one buyer with private values and analyze optimal selling mechanisms under ε -incentive compatibility. We establish that the gains that can be garnered depend on the local curvature of the seller’s revenue function around the optimal posted price when the buyer is a perfect optimizer. If the revenue function behaves locally like an α -power for α ∈ ( 1 , ∞ ) , then no mechanism can garner gains higher than order ε α / ( 2 α − 1 ) . This improves on state-of-the-art results that imply maximum gains of ε 1 / 2 by providing the first parametric bounds that capture the impact of revenue function’s curvature on revenue gains. Furthermore, we establish that an optimal mechanism needs to randomize as soon as ε > 0 and construct a randomized mechanism that is guaranteed to achieve order ε α / ( 2 α − 1 ) additional revenues, leading to a tight characterization of the revenue implications of approximate IC constraints. Our study sheds light on a novel class of optimization problems and the challenges that emerge when relaxing IC constraints. In particular, it brings forward the need to optimize not only over allocations and payments but also over best responses, and we develop a new framework to address this challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago R. Balseiro & Omar Besbes & Francisco Castro, 2024. "Mechanism Design Under Approximate Incentive Compatibility," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 355-372, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:1:p:355-372
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.2359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2359
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2022.2359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:1:p:355-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.