IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v59y2011i2p427-439.html

Drift Control with Changeover Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Melda Ormeci Matoglu

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Turkey)

  • John Vande Vate

    (School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

Abstract

We model the problem of managing capacity in a build-to-order environment as a Brownian drift control problem and seek a policy that minimizes the long-term average cost. We assume the controller can, at some cost, shift the processing rate among a finite set of alternatives, for example by adding or removing staff, increasing or reducing the number of shifts, or opening or closing production lines. The controller incurs a cost for capacity per unit time and a delay cost that reflects the opportunity cost of revenue waiting to be recognized or the customer service impacts of delaying delivery of orders. Furthermore, he incurs a cost per unit to reject orders or idle resources as necessary to keep the workload of waiting orders within a prescribed range. We introduce a practical restriction on this problem, called the (S-script)-restricted Brownian control problem, and show how to model it via a structured linear program. We demonstrate that an optimal solution to the (S-script)-restricted problem can be found among a special class of policies called deterministic nonoverlapping control band policies. These results exploit apparently new relationships between complementary dual solutions and relative value functions that allow us to obtain a lower bound on the average cost of any nonanticipating policy for the problem, even without the (S-script) restriction. Under mild assumptions on the cost parameters, we show that our linear programming approach is asymptotically optimal for the unrestricted Brownian control problem in the sense that by appropriately selecting the (S-script)-restricted problem, we can ensure its solution is within an arbitrary finite tolerance of a lower bound on the average cost of any nonanticipating policy for the unrestricted Brownian control problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Melda Ormeci Matoglu & John Vande Vate, 2011. "Drift Control with Changeover Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 427-439, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:2:p:427-439
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1100.0868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0868
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1100.0868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Helmes & R. H. Stockbridge, 2000. "Numerical Comparison of Controls and Verification of Optimality for Stochastic Control Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 107-127, July.
    2. Alan S. Manne, 1960. "Linear Programming and Sequential Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 259-267, April.
    3. Sunil Kumar & Kumar Muthuraman, 2004. "A Numerical Method for Solving Singular Stochastic Control Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 563-582, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xindan Li & Dan Tang & Yongjin Wang & Xuewei Yang, 2014. "Optimal processing rate and buffer size of a jump-diffusion processing system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 319-335, June.
    2. Yash Kanoria & Ilan Lobel & Jiaqi Lu, 2024. "Managing Customer Churn via Service Mode Control," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 1192-1222, May.
    3. Barιş Ata & Deishin Lee & Erkut Sönmez, 2019. "Dynamic Volunteer Staffing in Multicrop Gleaning Operations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 295-314, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vijay V. Desai & Vivek F. Farias & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2012. "Approximate Dynamic Programming via a Smoothed Linear Program," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 655-674, June.
    2. Kurt Helmes & Stefan Röhl, 2008. "A Geometrical Characterization of Multidimensional Hausdorff Polytopes with Applications to Exit Time Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 315-326, May.
    3. José Niño-Mora, 2006. "Restless Bandit Marginal Productivity Indices, Diminishing Returns, and Optimal Control of Make-to-Order/Make-to-Stock M/G/1 Queues," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 50-84, February.
    4. Sunil Kumar & Kumar Muthuraman, 2004. "A Numerical Method for Solving Singular Stochastic Control Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 563-582, August.
    5. Jennifer F. Morris & Vivek Srikrishnan & Mort D. Webster & John M. Reilly, 2018. "Hedging Strategies: Electricity Investment Decisions under Policy Uncertainty," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(1), pages 101-122, January.
    6. Dabadghao, Shaunak S. & Chockalingam, Arun & Soltani, Taimaz & Fransoo, Jan, 2021. "Valuing Switching options with the moving-boundary method," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Lodewijk Kallenberg, 2013. "Derman’s book as inspiration: some results on LP for MDPs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 63-94, September.
    8. Alexander Zadorojniy & Segev Wasserkrug & Sergey Zeltyn & Vladimir Lipets, 2019. "Unleashing Analytics to Reduce Costs and Improve Quality in Wastewater Treatment," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 262-268, July.
    9. Muthuraman, Kumar, 2008. "A moving boundary approach to American option pricing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 3520-3537, November.
    10. Balikcioglu, Metin & Fackler, Paul L., "undated". "A Numerical Method for Multidimensional Impulse and Barrier Control Problems," CEnREP Working Papers 277666, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    11. Höfferl, F. & Steinschorn, D., 2009. "A dynamic programming extension to the steady state refinery-LP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 465-474, September.
    12. Dabadghao, Shaunak S. & Chockalingam, Arun & Soltani, Taimaz & Fransoo, Jan C., 2021. "Valuing switching options with the moving-boundary method," Other publications TiSEM 45fe7e78-129f-4d41-ac2f-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Alexander Zadorojniy & Guy Even & Adam Shwartz, 2009. "A Strongly Polynomial Algorithm for Controlled Queues," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 992-1007, November.
    14. K. Helmes & R. H. Stockbridge, 2000. "Numerical Comparison of Controls and Verification of Optimality for Stochastic Control Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 107-127, July.
    15. Diego Klabjan & Daniel Adelman, 2007. "An Infinite-Dimensional Linear Programming Algorithm for Deterministic Semi-Markov Decision Processes on Borel Spaces," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 528-550, August.
    16. Michael O’Sullivan & Arthur F. Veinott, Jr., 2017. "Polynomial-Time Computation of Strong and n -Present-Value Optimal Policies in Markov Decision Chains," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 577-598, August.
    17. Pierre, Erwan & Villeneuve, Stéphane & Warin, Xavier, 2016. "Numerical approximation of a cash-constrained firm value with investment opportunities," IDEI Working Papers 860, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    18. Salo, Ahti & Andelmin, Juho & Oliveira, Fabricio, 2022. "Decision programming for mixed-integer multi-stage optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 550-565.
    19. James N. Cannon & Hugh M. Cannon & James T. Low, 2013. "Modeling Tactical Product-Mix Decisions," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(5), pages 624-644, October.
    20. Vijay V. Desai & Vivek F. Farias & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2012. "Pathwise Optimization for Optimal Stopping Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2292-2308, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:2:p:427-439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.