IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v48y2000i4p591-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heuristics for Balancing Turbine Fans

Author

Listed:
  • Samir V. Amiouny

    (1 LOG Inc., 1080 Linda Vista Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043)

  • John J. Bartholdi

    (School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • John H. Vande Vate

    (School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

Abstract

We develop heuristics for a problem that models the static balancing of turbine fans: load point masses at regularly spaced positions on the periphery of a circle so that the residual unbalance about the center---which corresponds to the axis of rotation of the fan---is as small as possible. We give worst-case guarantees for our heuristics in terms of residual unbalance. For the case of an even number of blades, we show that one of our heuristics provides the same worst-case guarantee (with respect to the ideal of perfect balance) as does total enumeration. Furthermore, computational tests show that our heuristics are orders of magnitude faster and not far from optimum on average.

Suggested Citation

  • Samir V. Amiouny & John J. Bartholdi & John H. Vande Vate, 2000. "Heuristics for Balancing Turbine Fans," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 591-602, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:4:p:591-602
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.4.591.12413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.48.4.591.12413
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.48.4.591.12413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mosevich, Jack, 1986. "Balancing hydraulic turbine runners--A discrete combinatorial optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 202-204, August.
    2. Fathi, Yahya & Ginjupalli, Krishna K., 1993. "A mathematical model and a heuristic procedure for the turbine balancing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 336-342, March.
    3. Laporte, Gilbert & Mercure, Helene, 1988. "Balancing hydraulic turbine runners: A quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 378-381, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pitsoulis, Leonidas S. & Pardalos, Panos M. & Hearn, Donald W., 2001. "Approximate solutions to the turbine balancing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 147-155, April.
    2. Hungerländer, Philipp & Anjos, Miguel F., 2015. "A semidefinite optimization-based approach for global optimization of multi-row facility layout," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 46-61.
    3. Anjos, Miguel F. & Vieira, Manuel V.C., 2017. "Mathematical optimization approaches for facility layout problems: The state-of-the-art and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Zvi Drezner & Peter Hahn & Éeric Taillard, 2005. "Recent Advances for the Quadratic Assignment Problem with Special Emphasis on Instances that are Difficult for Meta-Heuristic Methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 65-94, October.
    5. White, D. J., 1995. "Some concave-convex representations of the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 418-424, January.
    6. Anjos, Miguel F. & Fischer, Anja & Hungerländer, Philipp, 2018. "Improved exact approaches for row layout problems with departments of equal length," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 514-529.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:4:p:591-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.