IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v27y2025i5p1333-1343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

OM Forum–Working with Practitioners in Operations Management

Author

Listed:
  • Haijian Si

    (Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB21AG, United Kingdom)

  • Meng Li

    (C. T. Bauer College, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004)

  • Christoph H. Loch

    (IESE Business School, University of Navarra, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Problem definition : Collaborations between researchers and practitioners in operations management are becoming more common, and they can bridge the gap between theory and real-world application. This paper explores the process of managing such collaborations, emphasizing the importance of mutual trust, stakeholder management, and the alignment of academic rigor with practical value. Methodology/results : Drawing on experience and previous operations management literature, the study describes the operational steps of working with practitioners. It outlines a five-phase framework that can guide successful practitioner collaboration research: relationship building, stakeholder management, study design, study implementation, and poststudy management. The framework illustrates how rigorous research methods can be embedded in partner relationships that are governed by trust and ethical sensitivity, the success of which may sustain long-term academic-practitioner collaborations. Managerial implications : This paper offers a five-step road map for academics to undertake collaborations with practitioners that can generate theoretically sound as well as impactful research outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Haijian Si & Meng Li & Christoph H. Loch, 2025. "OM Forum–Working with Practitioners in Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1333-1343, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:5:p:1333-1343
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2025.0147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2025.0147
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2025.0147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:5:p:1333-1343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.