Author
Listed:
- Andreas Fügener
(Department of Operations Management, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany)
- Sebastian Schiffels
(Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Augsburg, 86135 Augsburg, Germany)
- Ulrich W. Thonemann
(Department of Operations Management, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany)
Abstract
Problem definition : A company’s project portfolio is an important success factor. Employing strategic buckets to segment the overall budget into budgets for different project types is a commonly used approach for managing project selection. Strategic buckets typically refer to sets of projects of a certain type, such as safe and risky projects. A strategic bucket specification defines the number of buckets and thresholds between them. This paper addresses the question of how different strategic buckets specifications affect decision makers’ project selection behavior. Methodology/results : We develop a behavioral model of the effect of strategic buckets on project selection and use laboratory experiments to analyze how bucket specifications affect project selection decisions. For various strategic bucket specifications where a rational decision maker would allocate the budget to projects of the project type matching their risk preference only, we find that actual decision makers have the tendency to allocate the budget evenly among buckets and among project types within buckets. This observation can be explained by the naïve diversification bias, and we observe this effect in experimental settings with different selection processes, project definitions, and subject pools. Managerial implications : Our findings allow companies to better understand the effect of buckets guidelines on actual project selection behavior and to manage their project portfolio selection by choosing the right bucket specification.
Suggested Citation
Andreas Fügener & Sebastian Schiffels & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2025.
"Project Portfolio Selection with Strategic Buckets—The Role of Naïve Diversification,"
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 1242-1257, July.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:4:p:1242-1257
DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0373
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:4:p:1242-1257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.