IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v27y2025i3p917-934.html

Algorithmic Assortment Curation: An Empirical Study of Buybox in Online Marketplaces

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Gallino

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Nil Karacaoglu

    (Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210)

  • Antonio Moreno

    (Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

Abstract

Problem definition : Online marketplaces have revolutionized online sales by creating platforms that connect millions of buyers and sellers. Although the presence of numerous third-party sellers attracts customers, it also results in a proliferation of listings for each product, making it difficult for customers to choose between the available options. To address this issue, online marketplaces employ algorithmic tools to curate and present different product listings to customers. Although tools that assist customers in choosing between different products , such as recommender systems and reviews, have been studied extensively, there is limited evidence regarding tools that help customers choose between different listings of the same product . This paper focuses on the buybox algorithm, an algorithmic tool that prominently presents one option as the default choice to customers. Methodology/results : We assess the influence of the buybox on marketplace dynamics by examining its staggered introduction within a major product category in a leading online marketplace. Our results show that the implementation of buybox increases the number of orders and enhances the efficiency of the customer journey. This is evidenced by an increase in conversion rates and a more pronounced buybox effect on the mobile channel, where search frictions are higher compared with the desktop channel. The introduction of buybox simplifies the process of posting new products on the marketplace, potentially reducing friction for sellers. We find supporting evidence for this hypothesis, because the number of sellers offering a product increases after the introduction of buybox. Managerial implications : Our analysis reveals that a buybox is an effective tool for reducing search frictions and stimulating competition among sellers. Customers benefit from lower prices and higher average quality levels when competition in a buybox is intense. However, the marketplace becomes more concentrated following the introduction of the buybox, representing an unintended consequence that platforms and vendors should manage. Our study contributes to the growing literature on algorithms in platforms by examining how algorithmic curation affects marketplace participants and overall marketplace dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Gallino & Nil Karacaoglu & Antonio Moreno, 2025. "Algorithmic Assortment Curation: An Empirical Study of Buybox in Online Marketplaces," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 917-934, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:3:p:917-934
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.0254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0254
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2023.0254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun Li & Serguei Netessine, 2020. "Higher Market Thickness Reduces Matching Rate in Online Platforms: Evidence from a Quasiexperiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 271-289, January.
    2. Ali Aouad & Daniela Saban, 2023. "Online Assortment Optimization for Two-Sided Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2069-2087, April.
    3. Anindya Ghose & Avi Goldfarb & Sang Pil Han, 2013. "How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 613-631, September.
    4. Erik Brynjolfsson & Yu (Jeffrey) Hu & Duncan Simester, 2011. "Goodbye Pareto Principle, Hello Long Tail: The Effect of Search Costs on the Concentration of Product Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(8), pages 1373-1386, August.
    5. Ruomeng Cui & Meng Li & Qiang Li, 2020. "Value of High-Quality Logistics: Evidence from a Clash Between SF Express and Alibaba," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 3879-3902, September.
    6. Dennis J. Zhang & Hengchen Dai & Lingxiu Dong & Qian Wu & Lifan Guo & Xiaofei Liu, 2019. "The Value of Pop-Up Stores on Retailing Platforms: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Alibaba," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(11), pages 5142-5151, November.
    7. Michael Dinerstein & Liran Einav & Jonathan Levin & Neel Sundaresan, 2018. "Consumer Price Search and Platform Design in Internet Commerce," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1820-1859, July.
    8. Stefano DellaVigna, 2009. "Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 315-372, June.
    9. Chrysanthos Dellarocas, 2003. "The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1407-1424, October.
    10. Mingyu Joo & Jiaqi Shi & Vibhanshu Abhishek, 2024. "Do Sellers Benefit from Sponsored Product Listings? Evidence from an Online Marketplace," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 817-839, July.
    11. Ignacio Rios & Daniela Saban & Fanyin Zheng, 2023. "Improving Match Rates in Dating Markets Through Assortment Optimization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1304-1323, July.
    12. Ruxian Wang & Ozge Sahin, 2018. "The Impact of Consumer Search Cost on Assortment Planning and Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3649-3666, August.
    13. David H. Autor, 2003. "Outsourcing at Will: The Contribution of Unjust Dismissal Doctrine to the Growth of Employment Outsourcing," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(1), pages 1-42, January.
    14. Yonatan Gur & Gregory Macnamara & Ilan Morgenstern & Daniela Saban, 2023. "Information Disclosure and Promotion Policy Design for Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(10), pages 5883-5903, October.
    15. Saravanan Kesavan & Tarun Kushwaha, 2020. "Field Experiment on the Profit Implications of Merchants’ Discretionary Power to Override Data-Driven Decision-Making Tools," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5182-5190, November.
    16. Nitish Jain & Tom Fangyun Tan, 2022. "M-Commerce, Sales Concentration, and Inventory Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 2256-2273, July.
    17. Kris J. Ferreira & Sunanda Parthasarathy & Shreyas Sekar, 2022. "Learning to Rank an Assortment of Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1828-1848, March.
    18. Ilan Lobel, 2021. "Revenue Management and the Rise of the Algorithmic Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5389-5398, September.
    19. Santiago Gallino & Antonio Moreno & Ioannis Stamatopoulos, 2017. "Channel Integration, Sales Dispersion, and Inventory Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2813-2831, September.
    20. Erik Brynjolfsson & Michael D. Smith, 2000. "Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 563-585, April.
    21. Vahideh Manshadi & Scott Rodilitz, 2022. "Online Policies for Efficient Volunteer Crowdsourcing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6572-6590, September.
    22. Dellarocas, Chrysanthos, 2003. "The Digitization of Word-of-mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms," Working papers 4296-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    23. Hyun Seok (Huck) Lee & Saravanan Kesavan & Camelia Kuhnen, 2022. "When do group incentives for retail store managers work?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3077-3095, August.
    24. Lusi Li & Jianqing Chen & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2018. "Recommender System Rethink: Implications for an Electronic Marketplace with Competing Manufacturers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 1003-1023, December.
    25. Kostas Bimpikis & Wedad J. Elmaghraby & Ken Moon & Wenchang Zhang, 2020. "Managing Market Thickness in Online Business-to-Business Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5783-5822, December.
    26. Songtao Li & Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Susan Feng Lu & Simin Huang, 2023. "Estimating the Stockout-Based Demand Spillover Effect in a Fashion Retail Setting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 468-488, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsing Kenneth Cheng & D. Daniel Sokol & Xinyu Zang, 2024. "The rise of empirical online platform research in the new millennium," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 416-451, March.
    2. Tedi Skiti & Xueming Luo & Zhijie Lin, 2022. "When More is Less: Quality and Variety Trade‐off in Sharing Economy Platforms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1817-1838, November.
    3. Wenchang Zhang & Wedad J. Elmaghraby & Ashish Kabra, 2026. "Marketplace Expansion Through Marquee Seller Adoption: Externalities and Reputation Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1112-1131, February.
    4. Diego Aparicio & Drazen Prelec & Weiming Zhu, 2025. "Choice Overload and the Long Tail: Consideration Sets and Purchases in Online Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 496-515, March.
    5. Zoë Cullen & Chiara Farronato, 2021. "Outsourcing Tasks Online: Matching Supply and Demand on Peer-to-Peer Internet Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 3985-4003, July.
    6. Edgardo Arturo Ayala Gaytán, 2009. "Social network externalities and price dispersion in online markets," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 1-28, November.
    7. Tobias Gesche, 2022. "Reference‐price shifts and customer antagonism: Evidence from reviews for online auctions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 558-578, August.
    8. Wei Zhou & Mingfeng Lin & Mo Xiao & Lu Fang, 2025. "Higher Precision Is Not Always Better: Search Algorithm and Consumer Engagement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(7), pages 6204-6226, July.
    9. Tianshu Sun & Zhe Yuan & Chunxiao Li & Kaifu Zhang & Jun Xu, 2024. "The Value of Personal Data in Internet Commerce: A High-Stakes Field Experiment on Data Regulation Policy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2645-2660, April.
    10. Gesche, Tobias, 2018. "Reference Price Shifts and Customer Antagonism: Evidence from Reviews for Online Auctions," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181650, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Xiaojuan Puyang & Zheyin (Jane) Gu & Rachel R. Chen & Juan Li, 2026. "Vertical Competition on a Common Platform," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 175-188, January.
    12. Chris Forman & Anindya Ghose & Avi Goldfarb, 2006. "Geography and Electronic Commerce: Measuring Convenience, Selection, and Price," Working Papers 06-15, NET Institute, revised Sep 2006.
    13. Zemin (Zachary) Zhong, 2022. "Chasing Diamonds and Crowns: Consumer Limited Attention and Seller Response," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4380-4397, June.
    14. Marios Kokkodis & Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis, 2016. "Reputation Transferability in Online Labor Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1687-1706, June.
    15. Xiaopeng Luo & Cheng He & Yu Jeffrey Hu & Xitong Li & Yuan Cheng, 2025. "The Impact of Mobile Data Cost on Consumer Price Sensitivity: A Study of a Hotel Booking App," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 1912-1925, September.
    16. Gary E. Bolton & Elena Katok & Axel Ockenfels, 2004. "How Effective Are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms? An Experimental Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1587-1602, November.
    17. Luis Aguiar Wicht, 2019. "Going Mobile: The Effects of Smartphone Usage on Internet Consumption," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2019-07, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Juan Feng & Xin Li & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2019. "Online Product Reviews-Triggered Dynamic Pricing: Theory and Evidence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1107-1123, December.
    19. Ratchford, Brian & Soysal, Gonca & Zentner, Alejandro & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Online and offline retailing: What we know and directions for future research," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 152-177.
    20. Saeed Tajdini, 2023. "The effects of internet search intensity for products on companies’ stock returns: a competitive intelligence perspective," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(3), pages 352-365, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:3:p:917-934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.