Author
Listed:
- Yicheng Liu
(Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China; and Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Research of Computation and Economics (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200433, China)
- Xiao Alison Chen
(Peter T. Paul College of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824)
- Yan Liu
(Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, Faculty of Business, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong)
- Zizhuo Wang
(School of Data Science, School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China)
Abstract
Problem definition : We study a multistore assortment planning problem in which a seller centrally decides the assortment of products in each store. Each store is visited by a certain fraction of customers. Upon arrival, customers observe the products offered in the current store. The seller can either (1) show products offered in other stores to customers simultaneously (called simultaneous offering strategy) or (2) show products offered in other stores to customers if they decide not to purchase in the current store (called sequential offering strategy). Customers may incur a disutility if they choose products from other stores. We study the optimal assortment planning problem under each of the two strategies and compare their performance. Methodology/results: We show that under the simultaneous strategy, the optimal assortment for each store is revenue-ordered, and the seller cannot do better than if it operates each store separately. In contrast, adopting the sequential strategy can significantly increase the seller’s revenue. In particular, when customers’ disutilities of purchasing from other stores are universally homogeneous, the optimal assortment under the sequential offering strategy is revenue-ordered for each store, and the store with a lower (higher, respectively) demand should offer a larger (smaller, respectively) assortment to facilitate the sequential selling process. We then compare the two offering strategies in terms of the seller’s revenue and customer surplus, and we analyze the impact of parameters on the revenue comparison. We also consider several extensions (e.g., heterogeneous valuation, capacity constraint, and partial recommendation) and find that our main results still hold qualitatively. Managerial implications : The sequential offering strategy may be a better strategy for sellers in practice. We provide detailed guidelines for sellers to implement the sequential strategy, such as regarding the optimal assortment decisions and when sellers can exploit the most benefits.
Suggested Citation
Yicheng Liu & Xiao Alison Chen & Yan Liu & Zizhuo Wang, 2025.
"Simultaneous vs. Sequential: Optimal Assortment Recommendation in Multistore Retailing,"
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 825-842, May.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:3:p:825-842
DOI: 10.1287/msom.2024.0761
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:3:p:825-842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.