IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v27y2025i3p789-807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obligatory Responses to FDA Inspection Outcomes and Future Drug Shortages

Author

Listed:
  • Yixin (Iris) Wang

    (Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820)

  • George Ball

    (Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405)

  • Gopesh Anand

    (Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820)

  • Hyunwoo Park

    (Graduate School of Data Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea)

Abstract

Problem definition : The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the regulator tasked with overseeing two key dimensions of the drug supply chain: quality and shortages. Whereas the primary policy tool used by the FDA to oversee drug quality is recurring plant inspections, there are fewer similar tools used by the FDA to reduce drug shortages. In an effort to better understand the pernicious public health problem of drug shortages and the role of the FDA in reducing shortages, the U.S. Congress tasked the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to study this problem. A key conclusion in the GAO report is that when the FDA gives their most unfavorable plant inspection outcome, those plants develop shortages soon thereafter, a possible sign of onerous FDA corrective actions that may come at the cost of reliable drug supplies. We examine whether these most unfavorable FDA inspection outcomes help or hinder drug shortages, using a rigorous econometric approach. Methodology/results : We employ instrumental variable (IV) analysis to conduct a verification of this GAO report. We examine the relationship between the most unfavorable inspection outcome given by the FDA, an official action indicated (OAI), and future drug shortage risks. We find that, contrary to the GAO report, OAI inspection outcomes lead to reduced shortage risks. Robustness checks give consistent results. In posthoc analyses, we continue to leverage instrumental variable analyses to explore the impact of the other inspection outcomes, as well as merely receiving an inspection, on shortage risks. We find evidence of an incrementally beneficial relationship between inspection outcome severity and shortage risk reduction. Managerial implications : The FDA hesitates to issue OAI outcomes, doing so at an exceedingly low rate. Our results indicate that if the GAO report created any organizational hesitancy on the part of the FDA to issue OAIs out of a concern that they may lead to shortages, this hesitancy appears to be unwarranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Yixin (Iris) Wang & George Ball & Gopesh Anand & Hyunwoo Park, 2025. "Obligatory Responses to FDA Inspection Outcomes and Future Drug Shortages," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 789-807, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:3:p:789-807
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0322
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.0322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:3:p:789-807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.