IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v27y2025i2p479-495.html

Frame by Fame: Content Creation on Short Video-Format Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Abhishek Deshmane

    (Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30308)

  • Xabier Barriola

    (School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands)

Abstract

Problem definition : Short video format platforms like NetEase and TikTok are attention economies that host user-generated content, in the form of combined video and audio elements, and operate on principles of network virality. This study explores user content creation strategies by focusing on decisions around content release frequency and the incorporation of adopted content in newly generated creations. Methodology/results : We theoretically explore the role of the following three mechanisms influencing these decisions: (a) social hierarchies in the platform’s network structure, (b) virality of content on the platform, and (c) algorithmic interventions through the ranking of content recommendations. To empirically study these relationships, we use a detailed log of user activity on NetEase Cloud Village registered during the month of November 2019 and carry out regression-based analyses. We find that high-status users, measured through their follower count, adapt their content release frequency strategically, slowing down after successful content to avoid dilution of potential virality. We also observe that high-status users generally deviate from prevailing viral trends in their content creation. However, following exceptionally successful releases, they tend to conform more to viral content, suggesting a risk-averse approach. Finally, contrary to algorithm aversion, users prefer content recommended by the platform. However, high-status users disregard algorithms to retain agency in decision making. Managerial implications : Our findings provide a holistic understanding of the content creation process and suggest that platforms could strategically adjust algorithmic ranking policies to foster content creation diversity while catering to the preferences of users with different status levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhishek Deshmane & Xabier Barriola, 2025. "Frame by Fame: Content Creation on Short Video-Format Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 479-495, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:2:p:479-495
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0153448 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Yan Chen & F. Maxwell Harper & Joseph Konstan & Sherry Xin Li, 2010. "Social Comparisons and Contributions to Online Communities: A Field Experiment on MovieLens," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1358-1398, September.
    3. Lifei Sheng & Christopher Thomas Ryan & Mahesh Nagarajan & Yuan Cheng & Chunyang Tong, 2022. "Incentivized Actions in Freemium Games," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 275-284, January.
    4. Ganesh Iyer & Zsolt Katona, 2016. "Competing for Attention in Social Communication Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2304-2320, August.
    5. Scott K. Shriver & Harikesh S. Nair & Reto Hofstetter, 2013. "Social Ties and User-Generated Content: Evidence from an Online Social Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1425-1443, June.
    6. Anjana Susarla & Jeong-Ha Oh & Yong Tan, 2012. "Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 23-41, March.
    7. Hemant K. Bhargava, 2022. "The Creator Economy: Managing Ecosystem Supply, Revenue Sharing, and Platform Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5233-5251, July.
    8. Matthew S. Bothner & Joel M. Podolny & Edward Bishop Smith, 2011. "Organizing Contests for Status: The Matthew Effect vs. the Mark Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 439-457, March.
    9. Rakesh R. Mallipeddi & Subodha Kumar & Chelliah Sriskandarajah & Yunxia Zhu, 2022. "A Framework for Analyzing Influencer Marketing in Social Networks: Selection and Scheduling of Influencers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 75-104, January.
    10. Berkeley J. Dietvorst & Joseph P. Simmons & Cade Massey, 2018. "Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1155-1170, March.
    11. Wilfred Amaldoss & Sanjay Jain, 2015. "Branding Conspicuous Goods: An Analysis of the Effects of Social Influence and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(9), pages 2064-2079, September.
    12. Olivier Toubia & Andrew T. Stephen, 2013. "Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 368-392, May.
    13. Nikhil Garg & Ramesh Johari, 2021. "Designing Informative Rating Systems: Evidence from an Online Labor Market," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 589-605, May.
    14. Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Ravi Bapna & Vladas Griskevicius, 2018. "Stimulating Online Reviews by Combining Financial Incentives and Social Norms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2065-2082, May.
    15. Timothy Gubler & Ian Larkin & Lamar Pierce, 2018. "Doing Well by Making Well: The Impact of Corporate Wellness Programs on Employee Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 4967-4987, November.
    16. Alan T. Sorensen, 2007. "Bestseller Lists And Product Variety," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 715-738, December.
    17. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    18. Jana Gallus, 2017. "Fostering Public Good Contributions with Symbolic Awards: A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment at Wikipedia," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 3999-4015, December.
    19. Zhiyu Zeng & Hengchen Dai & Dennis J. Zhang & Heng Zhang & Renyu Zhang & Zhiwei Xu & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2023. "The Impact of Social Nudges on User-Generated Content for Social Network Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5189-5208, September.
    20. Rishika Rishika & Jui Ramaprasad, 2019. "The Effects of Asymmetric Social Ties, Structural Embeddedness, and Tie Strength on Online Content Contribution Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3398-3422, July.
    21. Gordon Burtch & Qinglai He & Yili Hong & Dokyun Lee, 2022. "How Do Peer Awards Motivate Creative Content? Experimental Evidence from Reddit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3488-3506, May.
    22. David Godes & José C. Silva, 2012. "Sequential and Temporal Dynamics of Online Opinion," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 448-473, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junpeng Guo & Jiaqi Jiang & Siyuan Gou & Wenhua Li, 2026. "The impact of Danmu-enabled video-watching experience on audience loyalty intention towards vloggers: A parasocial relationship perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Marchenko & Hendrik Sonnabend, 2025. "The never-ending book: the role of new material and peer feedback in user-generated content production," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(3), pages 435-458, September.
    2. Lena Abou El-Komboz & Anna Kerkhof & Johannes Loh, 2023. "Platform Partnership Programs and Content Supply: Evidence from the YouTube “Adpocalypse”," CESifo Working Paper Series 10363, CESifo.
    3. Marchenko, Maria & Sonnabend, Hendrik, 2022. "The Never Ending Book: The role of external stimuli and peer feedback in user-generated content production," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 320, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Chenhui (Julian) Guo & Tae Hun Kim & Anjana Susarla & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2020. "Understanding Content Contribution Behavior in a Geosegmented Mobile Virtual Community: The Context of Waze," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1398-1420, December.
    5. Jens Forderer & Gordon Burtch, 2025. "Estimating Career Benefits from Online Community Leadership: Evidence from Stack Exchange Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 2443-2466, March.
    6. Tianshu Sun & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ginger Zhe Jin, 2019. "Mobile Messaging for Offline Group Formation in Prosocial Activities: A Large Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2717-2736, June.
    7. Zhiyu Zeng & Hengchen Dai & Dennis J. Zhang & Heng Zhang & Renyu Zhang & Zhiwei Xu & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2023. "The Impact of Social Nudges on User-Generated Content for Social Network Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5189-5208, September.
    8. Ni Huang & Gordon Burtch & Bin Gu & Yili Hong & Chen Liang & Kanliang Wang & Dongpu Fu & Bo Yang, 2019. "Motivating User-Generated Content with Performance Feedback: Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 327-345, January.
    9. Yuchi Zhang & David Godes, 2018. "Learning from Online Social Ties," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 425-444, May.
    10. Yan Chen & Peter Cramton & John A. List & Axel Ockenfels, 2021. "Market Design, Human Behavior, and Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5317-5348, September.
    11. Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2017. "Understanding Voluntary Knowledge Provision and Content Contribution Through a Social-Media-Based Prediction Market: A Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 529-546, September.
    12. Hinnosaar, Marit, 2019. "Gender inequality in new media: Evidence from Wikipedia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 262-276.
    13. Che-Wei Liu & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ritu Agarwal, 2019. "Unraveling the “Social” in Social Norms: The Conditioning Effect of User Connectivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1272-1295, April.
    14. Bian, Bei & Wang, Haiyan, 2025. "Quality management and feedback operation for user-generated content considering dynamic value belief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(2), pages 344-361.
    15. Dandan Qiao & Shun-Yang Lee & Andrew B. Whinston & Qiang Wei, 2020. "Financial Incentives Dampen Altruism in Online Prosocial Contributions: A Study of Online Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1361-1375, December.
    16. Zaiyan Wei & Mo Xiao & Rong Rong, 2021. "Network Size and Content Generation on Social Media Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1406-1426, May.
    17. Guodong Gao & Tianshu Sun & Ginger Zhe Jin, 2015. "Mobile Messaging for Offline Social Interactions: A Large Field Expeiment," Natural Field Experiments 00571, The Field Experiments Website.
    18. Tianshu Sun & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ginger Zhe Jin, 2015. "Mobile Messaging for Offline Group Formation in Prosocial Activities: A Large Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 21704, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Tianshu Sun & Sean J. Taylor, 2020. "Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 237-271, September.
    20. Qitian Ren, 2024. "Advertising and Content Creation on Digital Content Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 734-750, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:2:p:479-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.