IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i4p803-818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Multisiting on Productivity and Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Diwas KC

    (Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322)

  • Sokol Tushe

    (Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322)

Abstract

Problem definition : In the modern workplace, it is increasingly common for workers to concurrently attend to tasks across multiple physical locations. However, frequent site switching can lead to increased setup and overhead costs. Specifically, workers expend significant time and cognitive effort getting reoriented with personnel, operating processes, tools, and resources whenever they switch sites. In this paper, we look at the productivity and quality implications of multisite work. Academic/practical relevance : Although multisite workplace deployment is increasingly common, its impact on people operations has not been examined in the operations management literature. We contribute to the literature by studying the effect of multisiting on individual worker productivity and quality of output. Methodology : To estimate the effect of multisite operations on performance, we turn to a setting where multisite worker assignment is common—that of physicians who have admitting privileges at multiple hospitals. We collected detailed data on individual physicians practicing in 83 hospitals between 1999 and 2010. Our extensive data set includes detailed operational and clinical factors associated with more than 950,000 patient encounters. Our empirical analysis takes the form of a panel, where we follow a given physician over time and link short-term multisiting to patient-level outcomes. Results : We find that multisiting negatively impacts productivity. Specifically, for each additional site at which a physician works, we observe a 2% increase in patient length of stay. For each site served, the likelihood of a patient developing a complication increases by 3%. Greater travel distance between sites and lack of focus at a given site explain the performance declines due to multisiting. In addition, we find that the performance declines resulting from multisite operation are reduced among low-complexity patients and among highly experienced physicians. Managerial implications : Multisite performance losses need to be traded off against the potential benefits. The negative effects of multisiting can be mitigated by limiting multisite deployment to simpler tasks and among highly experienced physicians. Managers can decrease switching costs of multisite work by standardizing workflows, processes, and tools across sites. In addition, the practice of multisite work can be limited to sites that are physically proximate to avoid the overhead costs associated with excessive travel.

Suggested Citation

  • Diwas KC & Sokol Tushe, 2021. "The Effects of Multisiting on Productivity and Quality," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 803-818, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:803-818
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0879
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:803-818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.