IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v9y1963i3p358-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Replacement Policies for a Ballistic Missile

Author

Listed:
  • D. W. Jorgenson

    (University of California, Berkeley, and The RAND Corporation)

  • J. J. McCall

    (University of California, Berkeley, and The RAND Corporation)

Abstract

This paper applies, to ballistic missile systems, replacement policies for equipment subject to stochastic failures in which the actual state of the system--good or failed--is not known with certainty. Although it applies these policies only to the missile itself, optimal maintenance policies for the system as a whole are conceptually similar. The criterion employed for comparison of alternative maintenance policies is to minimize the total cost per expected piece of equipment good per period of time. Maximization of system reliability is a special case of this criterion which ignores the financial costs of maintenance actions. The range of maintenance policies examined may be subdivided in two ways. First, it may be assumed that the distribution of times to failure for parts not subject to inspection is known. Secondly, it may be assumed that the distribution is known but that one or more parameters characterizing the distribution are unknown. The central feature of these latter policies is that the interval between replacements is adapted to new information as it accumulates. A second subdivision encompasses those maintenance policies in which the time to replacement for the non-monitored part depends on the state of the remaining parts of the system, and those in which only the failure rate of the uninspected part and the cost of maintenance actions are taken into account in determining the replacement interval. The first class of policies is called "opportunistic," since optimal policies are designed to take advantage of opportunities arising through failures of the remaining parts. Opportunistic policies have a structure which may be described by a critical number N and a set of such critical numbers n 1 ,n 2 , ..., each corresponding to one of the parts under inspection. The optimal policy may be described as follows: For 0 \leqq x \leqq n i , the non-monitored part is not replaced if the i-th monitored part fails; for n i \leqq x \leqq N, the non-monitored part and the i-th monitored part are replaced whenever the i-th monitored part fails. For illustrative purposes, optimal policies of each type are computed for a hypothetical ballistic missile system. They are then compared with each other and with a rule of thumb frequently proposed for replacement policy: Replace at the mean time to failure.

Suggested Citation

  • D. W. Jorgenson & J. J. McCall, 1963. "Optimal Replacement Policies for a Ballistic Missile," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 358-379, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:9:y:1963:i:3:p:358-379
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rommert Dekker & Ralph Wildeman & Frank Duyn Schouten, 1997. "A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 45(3), pages 411-435, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:9:y:1963:i:3:p:358-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.