IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v32y1986i12p1582-1598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Primal Simplex Approach to Pure Processing Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Chou-Hong J. Chen

    (School of Business Administration, Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington 99258)

  • Michael Engquist

    (Department of General Business, College of Business Administration, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

Pure processing network problems are minimum cost flow problems in which the flow entering or leaving a node may be constrained to do so in given proportions. In this paper, new theoretical results concerning pure processing networks are developed, and, based on these results, two new primal simplex variants are presented. One of these variants has been implemented and tested against a general purpose linear programming code. A large class of problems is identified for which the specialized code is an order of magnitude faster than the general purpose code.

Suggested Citation

  • Chou-Hong J. Chen & Michael Engquist, 1986. "A Primal Simplex Approach to Pure Processing Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(12), pages 1582-1598, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:12:p:1582-1598
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.12.1582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.12.1582
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.32.12.1582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John W. Chinneck, 1990. "Formulating processing network models: Viability theory," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 245-261, April.
    2. Chinneck, J. W. & Moll, R. H. H., 1995. "Processing network models for forest management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 499-510, October.
    3. Michael Holzhauser & Sven O. Krumke & Clemens Thielen, 2017. "Maximum flows in generalized processing networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1226-1256, May.
    4. John W. Chinneck, 1992. "Viability analysis: A formulation aid for all classes of network models," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 531-543, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:12:p:1582-1598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.