IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v30y1984i2p156-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing Control Loss in Organizations: The Implications of Dual Hierarchies, Mentoring and Strengthening Vertical Dyadic Linkages

Author

Listed:
  • Martin G. Evans

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

Using Williamson's (1971) control loss model, the relative merits of dual hierarchies (P. B. Evans [Evans, P. B. 1975. Multiple hierarchies and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20 250--259.), strong vertical dyadic linkages, and mentoring for reducing overall control loss are explored. The potential impact for each organizational structure or process is assessed. Simulations are performed to examine the impact of each of these organizational arrangements for organizations with hierarchical levels ranging from 3 to 11 levels. In addition, the effects of deteriorating control at each level are investigated. In the discussion of appropriate control strategies, a number of other organizational characteristics are discussed. I conclude that: (1) Under conditions of sequential or reciprocal interdependence, building uniformly high control efficiency throughout the organization is essential. (2) In small organizations (and those with high turnover) dual hierarchies and cadre relations are appropriate mechanisms for reducing control loss. (3) In large organizations (and those with low turnover) mentoring and cadres are appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin G. Evans, 1984. "Reducing Control Loss in Organizations: The Implications of Dual Hierarchies, Mentoring and Strengthening Vertical Dyadic Linkages," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 156-168, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:2:p:156-168
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.30.2.156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.2.156
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.30.2.156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:2:p:156-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.