IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v23y1976i3p248-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Equilibrium Model for University Budget Planning

Author

Listed:
  • William F. Massy

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

A difference equation model of a university budget system is proposed and analyzed. The conditions for first and second-order dynamic equilibrium are determined, and it is shown that first-order equilibrium provides a useful criterion for financial health. Two sets of first-order solutions are examined: (1) those involving total expenditures, operating income, and the endowment payout rate; and (2) those involving tradeoffs between the net budget increase factor and tuition. The endowment payout rate emerges as a key policy variable that should be set on the basis of budget variables and total return on the endowment, rather than as the result of endowment yield. A region of instability in the solution space is defined; this region should be avoided. Stationary equilibrium, in which the fraction of the budget supported by endowment remains constant over time, simplifies the model and has other desirable properties.

Suggested Citation

  • William F. Massy, 1976. "A Dynamic Equilibrium Model for University Budget Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 248-256, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:23:y:1976:i:3:p:248-256
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.23.3.248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.23.3.248
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.23.3.248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johnes, Jill, 2015. "Operational Research in education," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 683-696.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:23:y:1976:i:3:p:248-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.