Author
Listed:
- Aron Culotta
(Computer Science, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118)
- Ginger Zhe Jin
(Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138)
- Yidan Sun
(Leadership and Organization Science, School of Management, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902)
- Liad Wagman
(Lally School of Management, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180)
Abstract
Consumer reviews, especially those expressing concerns of product quality, are crucial for the credibility of online platforms. However, reviews that criticize a product or service may also dissuade buyers from using the platform, creating a potential incentive to blur the visibility of critical reviews. Using Airbnb and official crime data in five major U.S. cities, we find that both reviews and personal experiences concerning the safety of a listing’s vicinity decrease guest bookings on the platform. Counterfactual simulations suggest that a complete removal of vicinity safety reviews (VSRs) could hurt guests if they do not adjust their beliefs accordingly, and such removal can increase revenues from reservations on Airbnb, with positive sorting toward listings formerly with VSRs. Conversely, highlighting VSRs would generate opposite effects. However, the incentive to suppress VSRs can be mitigated if guests have a rational expectation of average vicinity risk after all VSRs are removed or if guests can learn from their own vicinity safety experience for a long-enough time. Because VSRs are more closely correlated with official crime statistics in low-income and minority neighborhoods, our findings suggest that suppressing or highlighting VSRs would have different effects on different neighborhoods.
Suggested Citation
Aron Culotta & Ginger Zhe Jin & Yidan Sun & Liad Wagman, 2026.
"Safety Reviews on Airbnb: An Information Tale,"
Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 280-317, March.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:280-317
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2023.0552
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:280-317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.