IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v44y2025i3p725-727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary on “Pricing Prototypical Products”

Author

Listed:
  • Shichang Li

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People’s Republic of China)

  • Jingchuan Pu

    (Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611)

  • Quan Zheng

    (International Institute of Finance, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People’s Republic of China)

Abstract

The article by Amaldoss and He [Amaldoss W, He C (2013) Pricing prototypical products. Marketing Sci. 32(5):733–752] investigates how prototypicality changes the competitive behavior of firms in a horizontally differentiated market. Their study extends the spokes model by considering the asymmetry between the prototypical and nonprototypical products in terms of the probabilities of being included in consumers’ consideration sets. Their analyses show that when consumer valuations are low (moderately high), the prototypical product charges a lower (higher) price than a nonprototypical product. However, the asymmetric probabilities are overlooked when characterizing the demand for the prototypical product. With the correct demand function, we show that whether the prototypical product is priced lower depends on consumer valuations as well as the level of prototypicality, and the prototypical product can charge a lower price even when consumer valuations are moderately high. One should use extra caution when characterizing demands in the spokes model with asymmetric probabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shichang Li & Jingchuan Pu & Quan Zheng, 2025. "Commentary on “Pricing Prototypical Products”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 725-727, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:3:p:725-727
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2023.0579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0579
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2023.0579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:3:p:725-727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.