IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v44y2025i3p655-670.html

Understanding Users’ Content Contribution Behavior When Knowledge Can Be Priced

Author

Listed:
  • Ziwei Cong

    (Marketing Department, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia 20057)

  • Ying Zhao

    (Department of Marketing, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Zilei Zhang

    (Strategic Management Department, Shenwan Hongyuan (International), Wan Chai, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

With the rise of the creator economy, content platforms are exploring ways for creators to monetize their content. An increasingly popular approach is enabling content creators to offer paid content directly to viewers. This paper studies whether giving creators the option of providing paid content influences their incentives to contribute free content. Our setting is an online knowledge-sharing platform, which started out as a Q&A community based on users’ voluntary contributions and later introduced a program that allows participants to monetize their expertise by hosting paid live events. We find that participant motivations for contributing answers are rekindled after the program announcement, whereas the contributions of the nonparticipants continue to decrease. Further analysis shows that the motivating effect of program announcement is more pronounced for less established participants or participants facing more intense competition. Moreover, we show that participants adjust their answer contributions according to the time and topics of their paid events. These results suggest that participants strategically leverage free content to boost their reputation and attract “eyeballs” for their paid content. We discuss the implications of our findings for content platforms and content creators.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziwei Cong & Ying Zhao & Zilei Zhang, 2025. "Understanding Users’ Content Contribution Behavior When Knowledge Can Be Priced," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 655-670, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:3:p:655-670
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2022.0205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2022.0205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dina Mayzlin & Jiwoong Shin, 2011. "Uninformative Advertising as an Invitation to Search," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 666-685, July.
    2. Angrist, Joshua D., 2014. "The perils of peer effects," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 98-108.
    3. Matthew Mitchell, 2021. "Free ad(vice): internet influencers and disclosure regulation," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(1), pages 3-21, March.
    4. Yu-Kai Lin & Arun Rai & Yukun Yang, 2022. "Information Control for Creator Brand Management in Subscription-Based Crowdfunding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 846-866, September.
    5. Jean Tirole & Roland Bénabou, 2006. "Incentives and Prosocial Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1652-1678, December.
    6. Lei Xu & Tingting Nian & Luís Cabral, 2020. "What Makes Geeks Tick? A Study of Stack Overflow Careers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 587-604, February.
    7. Shunyuan Zhang & Dokyun Lee & Param Vir Singh & Kannan Srinivasan, 2022. "What Makes a Good Image? Airbnb Demand Analytics Leveraging Interpretable Image Features," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5644-5666, August.
    8. Thomas, Louis A., 1999. "Incumbent firms' response to entry: Price, advertising, and new product introduction," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 527-555, May.
    9. Yiting Deng & Anja Lambrecht & Yongdong Liu, 2023. "Spillover Effects and Freemium Strategy in the Mobile App Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5018-5041, September.
    10. Gordon Burtch & Seth Carnahan & Brad N. Greenwood, 2018. "Can You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(12), pages 5497-5520, December.
    11. Inyoung Chae & Jihyeon Ha & David A. Schweidel, 2023. "Paywall Suspensions and Digital News Subscriptions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 729-745, July.
    12. Nelson, Philip, 1974. "Advertising as Information," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(4), pages 729-754, July/Aug..
    13. Bunch, David S & Smiley, Robert, 1992. "Who Deters Entry? Evidence on the Use of Strategic Entry Deterrents," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 74(3), pages 509-521, August.
    14. Amy Pei & Dina Mayzlin, 2022. "Influencing Social Media Influencers Through Affiliation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 593-615, May.
    15. Monic Sun & Feng Zhu, 2013. "Ad Revenue and Content Commercialization: Evidence from Blogs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2314-2331, October.
    16. Junhong Chu & Yige Duan & Xianling Yang & Li Wang, 2021. "The Last Mile Matters: Impact of Dockless Bike Sharing on Subway Housing Price Premium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 297-316, January.
    17. Anja Lambrecht & Kanishka Misra, 2017. "Fee or Free: When Should Firms Charge for Online Content?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1150-1165, April.
    18. Shijie Lu & Dai Yao & Xingyu Chen & Rajdeep Grewal, 2021. "Do Larger Audiences Generate Greater Revenues Under Pay What You Want? Evidence from a Live Streaming Platform," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 964-984, September.
    19. Jana Gallus, 2016. "Fostering Voluntary Contributions to a Public Good: A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment at Wikipedia," Natural Field Experiments 00552, The Field Experiments Website.
    20. Yacheng Sun & Xiaojing Dong & Shelby McIntyre, 2017. "Motivation of User-Generated Content: Social Connectedness Moderates the Effects of Monetary Rewards," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 329-337, May.
    21. Marianne Bertrand & Esther Duflo & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(1), pages 249-275.
    22. Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Feng Zhu, 2011. "Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1601-1615, June.
    23. Dina Mayzlin & Yaniv Dover & Judith Chevalier, 2014. "Promotional Reviews: An Empirical Investigation of Online Review Manipulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(8), pages 2421-2455, August.
    24. Ignatius Horstmann & Sridhar Moorthy, 2003. "Advertising Spending and Quality for Services: The Role of Capacity," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 337-365, September.
    25. Jing Wang & Gen Li & Kai-Lung Hui, 2022. "Monetary Incentives and Knowledge Spillover: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3549-3572, May.
    26. Chiou, Lesley & Tucker, Catherine, 2013. "Paywalls and the demand for news," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 61-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jens Forderer & Gordon Burtch, 2025. "Estimating Career Benefits from Online Community Leadership: Evidence from Stack Exchange Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 2443-2466, March.
    2. Jing Wang & Gen Li & Kai-Lung Hui, 2022. "Monetary Incentives and Knowledge Spillover: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3549-3572, May.
    3. Shagun Tripathi & Georgios Petropoulos & Harris Kyriakou, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Algorithmic Quantity Regulations on Sharing Platforms: Evidence from Airbnb in Paris," CESifo Working Paper Series 11811, CESifo.
    4. Maria Marchenko & Hendrik Sonnabend, 2025. "The never-ending book: the role of new material and peer feedback in user-generated content production," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(3), pages 435-458, September.
    5. Bleier, Alexander & Fossen, Beth L. & Shapira, Michal, 2024. "On the role of social media platforms in the creator economy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 411-426.
    6. Vilma Todri, 2022. "Frontiers: The Impact of Ad-Blockers on Online Consumer Behavior," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 7-18, January.
    7. Uttara Ananthakrishnan & Davide Proserpio & Siddhartha Sharma, 2023. "I Hear You: Does Quality Improve with Customer Voice?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1143-1161, November.
    8. Inyoung Chae & Jihyeon Ha & David A. Schweidel, 2023. "Paywall Suspensions and Digital News Subscriptions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 729-745, July.
    9. Dongcheng Zhang & Hanchen Jiang & Maoshan Qiang & Kunpeng Zhang & Liangfei Qiu, 2025. "Time to Stop? An Empirical Investigation on the Consequences of Canceling Monetary Incentives on a Digital Platform," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 781-801, June.
    10. Tingting Song & Yi-Chun (Chad) Ho, 2025. "Relational Resonance and Content Creation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7366-7389, September.
    11. Anna Kerkhof, 2020. "Advertising and Content Differentiation: Evidence from YouTube," CESifo Working Paper Series 8697, CESifo.
    12. Cheng Zhao & Chong Alex Wang, 2023. "A cross-site comparison of online review manipulation using Benford’s law," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 365-406, March.
    13. Chen Liang & Yili Hong & Bin Gu, 2025. "Monitoring and the Cold Start Problem in Digital Platforms: Theory and Evidence from Online Labor Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 600-620, March.
    14. Brett Hollenbeck & Sridhar Moorthy & Davide Proserpio, 2019. "Advertising Strategy in the Presence of Reviews: An Empirical Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 793-811, September.
    15. Archishman Chakraborty & Rick Harbaugh, 2014. "Persuasive Puffery," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 382-400, May.
      • Archishman Chakraborty & Rick Harbaugh, 2012. "Persuasive Puffery," Working Papers 2012-05, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    16. Hangcheng Zhao & Ron Berman, 2025. "Strategic Response of News Publishers to Generative AI," Papers 2512.24968, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    17. Zike Cao & Yingpeng Zhu & Gen Li & Liangfei Qiu, 2024. "Consequences of Information Feed Integration on User Engagement and Contribution: A Natural Experiment in an Online Knowledge-Sharing Community," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1114-1136, September.
    18. Kim, Jeong-Yoo & Berg, Nathan, 2025. "Shill Advertising," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. Tingting Nian & Arun Sundararajan, 2022. "Social Media Marketing, Quality Signaling, and the Goldilocks Principle," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 540-556, June.
    20. Jialu Liu & Siqi Pei & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2024. "Online Food Delivery Platforms and Female Labor Force Participation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1074-1091, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:3:p:655-670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.