IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v3y1992i1p17-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects and Limitations of Automated Text Condensing on Reading Comprehension Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew H. Morris

    ((deceased) formerly of Department of Information and Management Sciences, College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306)

  • George M. Kasper

    (Department of Information Systems and Quantitative Sciences, College of Business Administration, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409)

  • Dennis A. Adams

    (Department of Decision and Information Sciences, College of Business Administration, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204)

Abstract

The optimal amount of information needed in a given decision-making situation lies somewhere along a continuum from “not enough” to “too much”. Ackoff proposed that information systems often hinder the decision-making process by creating information overload. To deal with this problem, he called for systems that could filter and condense data so that only relevant information reached the decision maker. The potential for information overload is especially critical in text-based information. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effects and theoretical limitations of extract condensing as a text processing tool in terms of recipient performance. In the experiment described here, an environment is created in which the effects of text condensing are isolated from the effects of message and individual recipient differences. The data show no difference in reading comprehension performance between the condensed forms and the original document. This indicates that condensed forms can be produced that are equally as informative as the original document. These results suggest that it is possible to apply a relatively simple computer algorithm to text and produce extracts that capture enough of the information contained in the original document so that the recipient can perform as if he or she had read the original. These results also identify a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of text condensing schemes. The research presented here contributes to a small but growing body of work on text-based information systems and, specifically, text condensing.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew H. Morris & George M. Kasper & Dennis A. Adams, 1992. "The Effects and Limitations of Automated Text Condensing on Reading Comprehension Performance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 17-35, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:3:y:1992:i:1:p:17-35
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.3.1.17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.17
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.3.1.17?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    2. Robert Farrell, 2002. "Summarizing electronic discourse," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(1), pages 23-38, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:3:y:1992:i:1:p:17-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.