Author
Listed:
- Tao Lu
(College of Business, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)
- Lihong Zhang
(School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
- Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang
(Department of Decisions, Operations and Technology, CUHK Business School, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)
- Zhenling Zhao
(Faculty of Business in Scitech, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)
Abstract
Uncertainty, particularly distribution uncertainty (a.k.a. ambiguity), holds significant relevance in both academic research and practical applications. Much of the existing research, however, has concentrated primarily on addressing outcome uncertainty (or risk), frequently neglecting the aspect of distribution uncertainty. This research delves into distribution uncertainty, a critical yet often overlooked aspect of empirical research. We argue that there is a pressing need to integrate considerations of ambiguity directly into the development and implementation of data analytics models, calling for the promotion and wider use of a well-defined measure of ambiguity. We introduce a quantitative measure of ambiguity that surpasses conventional approaches by precisely capturing distribution uncertainty. We illustrate the properties and advantages of this measure, highlighting its ability to enhance empirical models, yield more reliable parameter estimates, and contribute to the decision-making process. Using decision making in the financial market as an example, we demonstrate the value of this ambiguity measure. This paper promotes a more nuanced understanding of uncertainty and offers implications for both research methodologies and practical risk management.
Suggested Citation
Tao Lu & Lihong Zhang & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Zhenling Zhao, 2025.
"Beyond Risk: A Measure of Distribution Uncertainty,"
Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 944-961, June.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:944-961
DOI: 10.1287/isre.2022.0089
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:944-961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.