IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v36y2025i2p847-870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clocking in or Not? Optimal Design of a Novel Gamified Business Model in Online Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Gao

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Dengpan Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Subodha Kumar

    (Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

Abstract

Clocking-in cash-back ( CIC ), an emerging gamified business model in online learning, has recently garnered significant attention. CIC allows users to secure a full refund of the course fee through consecutive completion of specific tasks within a required time window. These tasks, known as clocking in , encompass activities such as daily assignments and sharing progress updates on social media. By employing this gamification system, the firm effectively monitors user efforts, categorizing them as winners or quitters based on clocking-in completion. Despite its growing popularity, this new business model has yet to be systematically analyzed in the literature. This paper fills this critical gap by examining how an online learning firm should set the optimal time window for its course and how the time window is affected by context-specific factors. We identify two opposing effects associated with extending the time window on users’ quitting time: the psychological-disutility increasing effect (negative) and the effort-cost decreasing effect (positive). Our results indicate that as quitters’ positive word-of-mouth (WOM) effects increase, there are cases in which the firm should opt for shortening the time window, primarily because of the psychological-disutility increasing effect outweighing the effort-cost decreasing effect. Furthermore, we find that it is not always beneficial for the firm to extend the time window when there is an increased presence of high-ability users. Additionally, we find that as the marginal content creation cost rises, instead of reducing the difficulty level of each task, the firm may find it more advantageous to raise the difficulty level by shortening the time window. Our findings provide valuable insights that online learning firms can utilize to enhance their design of the CIC mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Gao & Dengpan Liu & Subodha Kumar, 2025. "Clocking in or Not? Optimal Design of a Novel Gamified Business Model in Online Learning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 847-870, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:847-870
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.0138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0138
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2021.0138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:847-870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.