IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v36y2025i2p781-801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time to Stop? An Empirical Investigation on the Consequences of Canceling Monetary Incentives on a Digital Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Dongcheng Zhang

    (CUHK Business School, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China)

  • Hanchen Jiang

    (School of Government, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Maoshan Qiang

    (Institute of Project Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Kunpeng Zhang

    (Department of Decision, Operations and Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland 20742)

  • Liangfei Qiu

    (Department of Information Systems and Operations Management, Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611)

Abstract

Digital platforms commonly use monetary incentives to motivate users to perform specific tasks. Extant studies have shown the effects of introducing such monetary rewards on the outcomes of interest (e.g., participation and performance) on public platforms. However, little is known about the impact of canceling rewards (i.e., whether it simply reverses the effect of their introduction), and particularly less attention is paid to corporate platforms. Our study examines the impact of canceling monetary incentives using quasi-natural experiments on a corporate platform. Similar to prior studies focusing on public platforms, we find that introducing quantity-based monetary incentives increases participation (contribution quantity), but has no significant effect on performance (contribution quality). Yet, in contrast, our main empirical analysis reveals that canceling monetary incentives is not simply the reverse process of their introduction. In particular, compared with the increase in participation when monetary rewards were initially introduced, the cancellation of these rewards leads to a sharper decrease in participation. This suggests that canceling rewards has a net negative impact on participation. In addition, canceling monetary rewards also causes a significant decline in performance, which indicates that the effects of canceling and introducing rewards on performance are not simply the opposite of each other. Furthermore, we examine the heterogeneous responses of individuals with different self-motivation types and working competency levels to monetary incentives, highlighting the “asymmetry” between canceling and introducing incentives. We also discuss the similarities and differences between corporate and public platforms regarding the impact of monetary incentives. Our results provide important practical implications for enterprise information systems and general information systems regarding their design of platform strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongcheng Zhang & Hanchen Jiang & Maoshan Qiang & Kunpeng Zhang & Liangfei Qiu, 2025. "Time to Stop? An Empirical Investigation on the Consequences of Canceling Monetary Incentives on a Digital Platform," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 781-801, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:781-801
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2022.0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2022.0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:781-801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.