IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v36y2025i2p1228-1241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opening First-Party App Resources: Empirical Evidence of Free-Riding

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Soh

    (Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas 76109)

  • Pankaj Setia

    (Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380015, India)

  • Varun Grover

    (Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701)

Abstract

Platform owners are releasing their own apps on their platforms. These first-party apps (FPAs) typically leverage platform resources more effectively, competitively threatening rivals. Although the impact of FPAs on rivals’ innovation has been the subject of extensive study, the dominant view in previous research assumes that these FPAs are closed to third-party apps (TPAs). However, there is an increasing trend of FPAs opening their resources to TPAs, as they provide application programming interfaces (APIs) allowing TPAs to access their resources. Rivals still exist, as many TPAs choose not to have access to FPAs’ open resources because of their limited control over these resources. Does opening an FPA’s resources impact rivals’ innovation? The answer to the question is largely unknown. We exploit the release of the Apple Health Records API, a feature that opens Apple Health Records to TPAs, to design a quasi-experiment that investigates whether and how opening an FPA’s resources influence rivals’ innovations. Through several analyses, we conclude that opening an FPA’s resources to TPAs generates free-riding benefits for rivals. Moreover, these benefits mainly arise because of the growing presence of TPAs that do not adopt FPAs’ open resources in the market. We discuss the theoretical contributions and practical implications of our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Soh & Pankaj Setia & Varun Grover, 2025. "Opening First-Party App Resources: Empirical Evidence of Free-Riding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 1228-1241, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:1228-1241
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.0607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0607
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2021.0607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:1228-1241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.