IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v36y2025i2p1167-1182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Popularity Cues and Peer Endorsements on Assertive Social Media Ads

Author

Listed:
  • Ashish Agarwal

    (McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

  • Shun-Yang Lee

    (D’Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115)

  • Andrew B. Whinston

    (McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

Social media platforms, such as Facebook, often display assertive call-to- action ads that encourage direct conversion actions, such as purchasing a product or installing an app. Additionally, these ads can display popularity signals (i.e., “likes”) and social endorsement from friends (i.e., friends’ “likes”). We examine the effectiveness of displaying these different signals on such ads in generating clicks through field tests conducted on Facebook. We collaborated with a mobile app company and conducted a call-to-action ad campaign on Facebook, targeting unique user groups with this type of ads for a mobile app. Our findings reveal that the overall number of “likes” associated with the ad does not impact the user’s decision to click the ad. Additionally, ads endorsed by friends have a lower clicking performance compared with those without such endorsement. Further analyses based on randomized laboratory studies and additional field tests using different products and apps confirm these results and demonstrate that the presence of these cues activates users’ persuasion knowledge of assertive call-to-action ads, resulting in a lower click performance. Furthermore, the negative impact of social cues is particularly pronounced when there is low similarity between users and their friends. These results have significant implications for the design of assertive call-to-action ads on social media platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashish Agarwal & Shun-Yang Lee & Andrew B. Whinston, 2025. "The Effect of Popularity Cues and Peer Endorsements on Assertive Social Media Ads," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 1167-1182, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:1167-1182
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.0606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0606
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2021.0606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:1167-1182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.