IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v36y2025i2p1129-1146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Omnificence or Differentiation? An Empirical Study of Knowledge Structure and Career Development of IT Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Yingjie Zhang

    (Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng

    (Naveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75080)

  • Bin Gu

    (Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215)

Abstract

Amid the growing importance of information technology (IT) in the business landscape, the pivotal role of IT knowledge on the demand side of the labor market, at both industry and firm levels, is well documented. However, the important labor supply side concerning IT workers has remained largely unknown. This raises challenges about how IT professionals should strategically cultivate their IT knowledge structures toward a sustainable, well-compensated career path. This paper bridges this gap by examining how different types of IT knowledge structures of IT workers impact their salaries and job security over time. We theorize, define, and operationalize two new metrics to characterize the knowledge structures of an IT worker. Knowledge omnificence measures the breadth of an IT worker’s own knowledge structure, whereas knowledge differentiation assesses the extent of difference between one’s knowledge set and those of their peers. By analyzing extensive career data of IT workers from 2000 to 2016, we demonstrated that, on average, a high level of IT knowledge differentiation or omnificence yields positive economic returns for IT workers. However, there is an intriguing twist: such a positive relationship is not monotonic. The most advantageous strategy is to acquire IT knowledge at moderate levels of knowledge omnificence and differentiation. Further, our results revealed another new twist: to increase salary potential or pursue a better position, one should aim for knowledge omnificence, whereas those valuing job security should aim for knowledge differentiation. This aligns with our theoretical rationale that utilizes a structured framework, integrating the dynamic capability framework and the boundaryless career theory. Besides, we found that both knowledge omnificence and differentiation reduced gender disparity in the labor market. In particular, females benefited more, with a 14.74% (or 1.38%) increase in salary, from having a one-unit increase in knowledge omnificence (or differentiation). This study holds critical managerial implications for IT workers, firms, and policymakers. It emphasizes the importance of strategic management of IT knowledge structure in enabling IT workers to thrive in the dynamic and competitive IT job market.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingjie Zhang & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & Bin Gu, 2025. "Omnificence or Differentiation? An Empirical Study of Knowledge Structure and Career Development of IT Workers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 1129-1146, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:1129-1146
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2022.0634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0634
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2022.0634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:1129-1146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.