IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v36y2025i1p440-455.html

Conversation Analytics: Can Machines Read Between the Lines in Real-Time Strategic Conversations?

Author

Listed:
  • Yanzhen Chen

    (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong)

  • Huaxia Rui

    (University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627)

  • Andrew B. Whinston

    (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

Strategic conversations involve one party with an informational advantage and another with an interest in the information. This paper proposes machine learning–based methods to quantify the evasiveness and incoherence of the more-informed party during real-time strategic conversations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of these methods in a real-world setting, we consider the question-and-answer sessions of earnings conference calls, during which managers face scrutinizing questions from analysts. Being reluctant to disclose adverse information, managers may resort to evasive answers and sometimes respond less coherently than they otherwise would. Using data from the earnings calls of S&P 500 companies from 2006 to 2018, we show that the proposed measures predict worse next-quarter earnings. The stock market also perceives incoherence as a negative signal. This paper contributes methodologically to business analytics by developing machine learning methods to extract behavioral cues from real-time strategic conversations. We believe the wide adoption of these tools can increase the efficiency of various markets and institutions where real-time strategic conversations routinely occur, which ultimately benefits business and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanzhen Chen & Huaxia Rui & Andrew B. Whinston, 2025. "Conversation Analytics: Can Machines Read Between the Lines in Real-Time Strategic Conversations?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 440-455, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:440-455
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2022.0415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0415
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2022.0415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
    2. Jessen L. Hobson & William J. Mayew & Mohan Venkatachalam, 2012. "Analyzing Speech to Detect Financial Misreporting," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 50(2), pages 349-392, May.
    3. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2014. "Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(4), pages 1643-1671, August.
    4. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    5. Loughran, Tim & McDonald, Bill, 2013. "IPO first-day returns, offer price revisions, volatility, and form S-1 language," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 307-326.
    6. Khalmetski, Kiryl & Rockenbach, Bettina & Werner, Peter, 2017. "Evasive lying in strategic communication," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 59-72.
    7. Ulrike Malmendier & Devin Shanthikumar, 2014. "Do Security Analysts Speak in Two Tongues?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(5), pages 1287-1322.
    8. Lawrence, Alastair, 2013. "Individual investors and financial disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 130-147.
    9. Hwang, Byoung-Hyoun & Kim, Hugh Hoikwang, 2017. "It pays to write well," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 373-394.
    10. Ertugrul, Mine & Lei, Jin & Qiu, Jiaping & Wan, Chi, 2017. "Annual Report Readability, Tone Ambiguity, and the Cost of Borrowing," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 811-836, April.
    11. Jason V. Chen & Venky Nagar & Jordan Schoenfeld, 2018. "Manager-analyst conversations in earnings conference calls," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1315-1354, December.
    12. Eric K. Kelley & Paul C. Tetlock, 2013. "How Wise Are Crowds? Insights from Retail Orders and Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(3), pages 1229-1265, June.
    13. Paul Milgrom & John Roberts, 1986. "Relying on the Information of Interested Parties," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(1), pages 18-32, Spring.
    14. Brian J. Bushee & Ian D. Gow & Daniel J. Taylor, 2018. "Linguistic Complexity in Firm Disclosures: Obfuscation or Information?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(1), pages 85-121, March.
    15. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2011. "When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(1), pages 35-65, February.
    16. Hailiang Chen & Prabuddha De & Yu (Jeffrey) Hu & Byoung-Hyoun Hwang, 2014. "Wisdom of Crowds: The Value of Stock Opinions Transmitted Through Social Media," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(5), pages 1367-1403.
    17. Jegadeesh, Narasimhan & Titman, Sheridan, 1993. "Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(1), pages 65-91, March.
    18. Crawford, Vincent P & Sobel, Joel, 1982. "Strategic Information Transmission," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1431-1451, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joshua Foster & Fredrik Odegaard, 2025. "Decoding Consumer Preferences Using Attention-Based Language Models," Papers 2507.17564, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rjiba, Hatem & Saadi, Samir & Boubaker, Sabri & Ding, Xiaoya (Sara), 2021. "Annual report readability and the cost of equity capital," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Kiridaran Kanagaretnam & Wen Li & Guifeng Shi & Zejiang Zhou, 2025. "Ambiguity of tone in annual reports and bank risk taking," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(1), pages 935-970, March.
    3. Umar, Tarik, 2022. "Complexity aversion when SeekingAlpha," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    4. Minxing Sun & Weike Xu, 2024. "Short selling and readability in financial disclosures: A controlled experiment," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(2), pages 265-292, May.
    5. Hossain, Amir & Bose, Sudipta & Shamsuddin, Abul, 2025. "Do integrated report readability and tone convey value relevant information? International evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    6. Li, Ken, 2022. "Textual fundamentals in earnings press releases," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Chen, Xin & Park, June Woo & Tsang, Albert & Xin, Yingying, 2025. "CEO left-handedness and readability," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. repec:osf:socarx:akt2c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    10. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Samarakoon, S.M.R.K. & Wijesinghe, B.A.C.H. & Maradana, Rana P., 2025. "Clear or confusing? How financial report readability and tone are associated with dividend payouts in Indian corporations," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Cookson, J. Anthony & Moon, S. Katie & Noh, Joonki, 2020. "Imprecise and Informative: Lessons from Market Reactions to Imprecise Disclosure," SocArXiv akt2c, Center for Open Science.
    12. de Souza, João Antônio Salvador & Rissatti, Jean Carlo & Rover, Suliani & Borba, José Alonso, 2019. "The linguistic complexities of narrative accounting disclosure on financial statements: An analysis based on readability characteristics," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 59-74.
    13. Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Huang, Winifred & Yang, Min, 2025. "Innovation and annual report readability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    14. Farrell, Michael & Murphy, Dermot & Painter, Marcus & Zhang, Guangli, 2023. "The complexity yield puzzle: A textual analysis of municipal bond disclosures," Working Papers 338, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    15. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2016. "Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 54(4), pages 1187-1230, September.
    16. Chen, Hailiang & Hwang, Byoung-Hyoun, 2022. "Listening in on investors’ thoughts and conversations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 426-444.
    17. Liu, Sha & Han, Jingguang, 2020. "Media tone and expected stock returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Jin, Zuben, 2024. "Business aspects in focus, investor underreaction and return predictability," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Ahmad, Khurshid & Han, JingGuang & Hutson, Elaine & Kearney, Colm & Liu, Sha, 2016. "Media-expressed negative tone and firm-level stock returns," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 152-172.
    20. Bask, Mikael & Forsberg, Lars & Östling, Andreas, 2024. "Media sentiment and stock returns," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 303-311.
    21. Li, Hong-Quan & Yang, Yang & Xue, Feng-Wan & Liu, Zhi-Yi, 2024. "Annual report readability and trade credit financing: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:440-455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.