IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v11y1981i5p101-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Squandering of Resources and Profits via Linear Programming

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Zeleny

    (The Joseph A. Martino Graduate School of Business Administration, Fordham University at Lincoln Center, New York, New York 10023)

Abstract

Optimization of a given system is certainly different from design of an optimal system. It is remarkable that in the age of limited resources and lagging productivity it is the philosophy of linear programming, i.e., maximization of a function with respect to given constraints, which dominates Operations Research thinking, education, and practice. This philosophy is wasteful of resources, ignorant of productivity, and, more surprisingly, unconcerned about profits. It teaches how to “optimize” a given system without paying enough attention to how such a system comes into existence. It is the purpose of this paper to show that the main shortcoming of LP is neither its linearity assumption, nor its algorithmic and scale inefficiency, nor its single-objective simplification---it is its inability to design an optimal system while concentrating on fine-tuning its “optimization” of a given system. How does the “given” come into being, that is the question.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Zeleny, 1981. "On the Squandering of Resources and Profits via Linear Programming," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 101-107, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:11:y:1981:i:5:p:101-107
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.11.5.101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.11.5.101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.11.5.101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. V J Mabin & J Davies & S Kim, 2009. "Rethinking tradeoffs and OR/MS methodology," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1384-1395, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:11:y:1981:i:5:p:101-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.