IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v33y2021i1p51-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic Decomposition for Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programs with Random Cost Coefficients

Author

Listed:
  • Harsha Gangammanavar

    (Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275)

  • Yifan Liu

    (84.51°, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202;)

  • Suvrajeet Sen

    (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089)

Abstract

Stochastic decomposition (SD) has been a computationally effective approach to solve large-scale stochastic programming (SP) problems arising in practical applications. By using incremental sampling, this approach is designed to discover an appropriate sample size for a given SP instance, thus precluding the need for either scenario reduction or arbitrary sample sizes to create sample average approximations (SAA). When compared with the solutions obtained using the SAA procedure, SD provides solutions of similar quality in far less computational time using ordinarily available computational resources. However, previous versions of SD were not applicable to problems with randomness in second-stage cost coefficients. In this paper, we extend its capabilities by relaxing this assumption on cost coefficients in the second stage. In addition to the algorithmic enhancements necessary to achieve this, we also present the details of implementing these extensions, which preserve the computational edge of SD. Finally, we illustrate the computational results obtained from the latest implementation of SD on a variety of test instances generated for problems from the literature. We compare these results with those obtained from the regularized L-shaped method applied to the SAA function of these problems with different sample sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Harsha Gangammanavar & Yifan Liu & Suvrajeet Sen, 2021. "Stochastic Decomposition for Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programs with Random Cost Coefficients," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 51-71, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:1:p:51-71
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2019.0929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2019.0929
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2019.0929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suvrajeet Sen & Yifan Liu, 2016. "Mitigating Uncertainty via Compromise Decisions in Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming: Variance Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1422-1437, December.
    2. Julia L. Higle & Suvrajeet Sen, 1991. "Stochastic Decomposition: An Algorithm for Two-Stage Linear Programs with Recourse," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 650-669, August.
    3. Julia Higle & Suvrajeet Sen, 1999. "Statistical approximations forstochastic linear programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 85(0), pages 173-193, January.
    4. Jeff Linderoth & Alexander Shapiro & Stephen Wright, 2006. "The empirical behavior of sampling methods for stochastic programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 215-241, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ksciuk, Jana & Kuhlemann, Stefan & Tierney, Kevin & Koberstein, Achim, 2023. "Uncertainty in maritime ship routing and scheduling: A Literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 499-524.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suvrajeet Sen & Yifan Liu, 2016. "Mitigating Uncertainty via Compromise Decisions in Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming: Variance Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1422-1437, December.
    2. Yunxiao Deng & Suvrajeet Sen, 2022. "Predictive stochastic programming," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 65-98, January.
    3. Wim van Ackooij & Welington de Oliveira & Yongjia Song, 2018. "Adaptive Partition-Based Level Decomposition Methods for Solving Two-Stage Stochastic Programs with Fixed Recourse," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 57-70, February.
    4. Ward Romeijnders & David P. Morton & Maarten H. van der Vlerk, 2017. "Assessing the Quality of Convex Approximations for Two-Stage Totally Unimodular Integer Recourse Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 211-231, May.
    5. Atakan, Semih & Gangammanavar, Harsha & Sen, Suvrajeet, 2022. "Towards a sustainable power grid: Stochastic hierarchical planning for high renewable integration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 381-391.
    6. Blanchot, Xavier & Clautiaux, François & Detienne, Boris & Froger, Aurélien & Ruiz, Manuel, 2023. "The Benders by batch algorithm: Design and stabilization of an enhanced algorithm to solve multicut Benders reformulation of two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 202-216.
    7. Xiaotie Chen & David L. Woodruff, 2023. "Software for Data-Based Stochastic Programming Using Bootstrap Estimation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 1218-1224, November.
    8. Martin Biel & Mikael Johansson, 2022. "Efficient Stochastic Programming in Julia," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1885-1902, July.
    9. Arnab Bhattacharya & Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh & Bo Zeng, 2023. "A Nonconvex Regularization Scheme for the Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming Algorithm," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1161-1178, September.
    10. Site Wang & Harsha Gangammanavar & Sandra Ekşioğlu & Scott J. Mason, 2020. "Statistical estimation of operating reserve requirements using rolling horizon stochastic optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 371-397, September.
    11. Panos Parpas & Berk Ustun & Mort Webster & Quang Kha Tran, 2015. "Importance Sampling in Stochastic Programming: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 358-377, May.
    12. Babak Saleck Pay & Yongjia Song, 2020. "Partition-based decomposition algorithms for two-stage Stochastic integer programs with continuous recourse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(2), pages 583-604, January.
    13. Postek, Krzysztof & Romeijnders, Ward & den Hertog, Dick & van der Vlerk, Maarten H., 2019. "An approximation framework for two-stage ambiguous stochastic integer programs under mean-MAD information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 432-444.
    14. Fengqi You & Ignacio Grossmann, 2013. "Multicut Benders decomposition algorithm for process supply chain planning under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 191-211, November.
    15. Jangho Park & Rebecca Stockbridge & Güzin Bayraksan, 2021. "Variance reduction for sequential sampling in stochastic programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 171-204, May.
    16. Zahra Azadi & Harsha Gangammanavar & Sandra Eksioglu, 2020. "Developing childhood vaccine administration and inventory replenishment policies that minimize open vial wastage," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 215-247, September.
    17. M. Jenabi & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & S. A. Torabi & Moeen Sammak Jalali, 2022. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic power system expansion planning using sample average approximation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1304-1336, December.
    18. Michael Freimer & Jeffrey Linderoth & Douglas Thomas, 2012. "The impact of sampling methods on bias and variance in stochastic linear programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 51-75, January.
    19. Zéphyr, Luckny & Lang, Pascal & Lamond, Bernard F. & Côté, Pascal, 2017. "Approximate stochastic dynamic programming for hydroelectric production planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 586-601.
    20. Alexandre Forel & Martin Grunow, 2023. "Dynamic stochastic lot sizing with forecast evolution in rolling‐horizon planning," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 449-468, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:1:p:51-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.