IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ordeca/v13y2016i1p51-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partition Dependence and Carryover Biases in Subjective Probability Assessment Surveys for Continuous Variables: Model-Based Estimation and Correction

Author

Listed:
  • Venkata R. Prava

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218)

  • Robert T. Clemen

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

  • Benjamin F. Hobbs

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218)

  • Melissa A. Kenney

    (Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center/Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites-Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20740)

Abstract

As probability elicitation becomes widely used, methods other than one-on-one interviews are being used to elicit expert probabilities. This paper considers biases that may arise when probabilities are elicited in an online or workbook setting. We develop a prescriptive model in which the elicited probability is a convex combination of the expert’s underlying probability with elements of partition dependence and two anchors arising from responses to previous questions (“carryover” bias). Our model, applied to two data sets, allows us to estimate the amount of the various biases in a set of elicited probabilities from experts. We find that both the format of the questions—whether they appear on the same or separate pages/screens—and the ordering of the questions can affect the amount of bias. Our research addresses biases in the presence of multiple anchors and provides guidance on manipulating the availability of anchors. The results demonstrate the persistence of anchoring even with careful questionnaire design; thus, the proposed model-based methods are useful to suggest corrections for the resulting biases.

Suggested Citation

  • Venkata R. Prava & Robert T. Clemen & Benjamin F. Hobbs & Melissa A. Kenney, 2016. "Partition Dependence and Carryover Biases in Subjective Probability Assessment Surveys for Continuous Variables: Model-Based Estimation and Correction," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 51-67, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:51-67
    DOI: 10.1287/deca.2015.0323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.2015.0323
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/deca.2015.0323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel J. Benjamin, 2018. "Errors in Probabilistic Reasoning and Judgment Biases," GRU Working Paper Series GRU_2018_023, City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics and Finance, Global Research Unit.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:51-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.